2005
DOI: 10.1007/0-387-24565-0_7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-Native Speaker Teachers and Awareness of Lexical Difficulty in Pedagogical Texts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Two Hong Kong studies illustrate the point. McNeill (2005) found that novice NNESTs in Hong Kong were more able to predict lexical difficulties in pedagogical texts for Cantonese-speaking students than both novice and expert NESTs. Cheung and Braine (2007) surveyed undergraduate university students and found that NESTs were appreciated for their proficiency, fluency and cultural knowledge, whereas NNESTs were appreciated for their empathy, shared cultural background and stricter expectations.…”
Section: Local and Non-local Nnestsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Two Hong Kong studies illustrate the point. McNeill (2005) found that novice NNESTs in Hong Kong were more able to predict lexical difficulties in pedagogical texts for Cantonese-speaking students than both novice and expert NESTs. Cheung and Braine (2007) surveyed undergraduate university students and found that NESTs were appreciated for their proficiency, fluency and cultural knowledge, whereas NNESTs were appreciated for their empathy, shared cultural background and stricter expectations.…”
Section: Local and Non-local Nnestsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…After these reflections and discussions, several studies were conducted that investigated the linguistic and pedagogical differences that may exist between native and non-native English-speaking teachers. In comparing expert and novice NSs and NNSs in an EFL context, for example, McNeill (2005) noticed that novice Chinese NNS teachers were very skilled at predicting which words would be easy and difficult to understand for Cantonese-speaking EFL students. Conversely, both expert and novice NS teachers were quite incapable of making accurate predictions.…”
Section: Research On Non-native Speakers English Teachers: Issues Andmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pennycook (2004) challenges this idea of fixed linguistic identity based on race, culture and location and highlights the need to cut this umbilical cord attached to the womb of colonialism. McNeill (2005) echoes similar idea about differences between an NEST and an NNEST where being native speaker of a language is more of societal belonging, http://journals.uob.edu.bh identification to locale, and birth right than proficiency and competency. Medgyes (1992), after objectively examining different variables on the basis of which native and non-native speaking teachers are more commonly judged, came to the conclusion that NNESTs and NESTs can perform with equal professional competence as the only variable that is inherently advantageous for NESTs is natural competence of language, which Davies (1991in Faez, 2011 defines as "the language learnt first,……the bio-developmental definition".…”
Section: Nativeness Vs Non-nativeness In Eltmentioning
confidence: 62%