1996
DOI: 10.5711/morj.2.2.37
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-Monotonicity, Chaos and Combat Models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One controversy involves the discovery that very simple deterministic battle models can exhibit chaos (Dewar et al 1991). The question of the impact of chaos on the more complex models that are actually used is obvious.…”
Section: Other Controversiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One controversy involves the discovery that very simple deterministic battle models can exhibit chaos (Dewar et al 1991). The question of the impact of chaos on the more complex models that are actually used is obvious.…”
Section: Other Controversiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) has done work on DE-based models (37) exhibiting chaos, and RAND has shown chaos arising from certain models, even very simple ones (38). In particular, Dockery and Woodcock have analyzed several models, including Lanchester-based and ones incorporating reinforcement, utilizing Lyapunov exponents (discussed in the next subsection) and fractal mathematics (39).…”
Section: Chaosmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is important to note that the reinforcement schedule for Iwo Jima and the analyses of the battle are time based, not condition based. Condition-based reinforcement rules may lead to nonmonotone results (see Dewar et al 1996).…”
Section: Iwo Jima Networked (Present Day)mentioning
confidence: 99%