2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.cplett.2014.10.050
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-monotonic pressure dependence of band gap in SnTe

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, w-InSb and SnTe are direct bandgap semiconductors, while CdTe 2 exhibits an indirect bandgap character. The calculated bandgaps of 0.19, 0.09, and 0.94 eV using the HSE + SOC method agree well with previous works, as shown in Table , further confirming the validity of our approach. In comparison to w-InSb and SnTe, CdTe 2 possesses a wider bandgap, which makes it a suitable candidate for thermoelectric applications across a wide temperature range.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Thus, w-InSb and SnTe are direct bandgap semiconductors, while CdTe 2 exhibits an indirect bandgap character. The calculated bandgaps of 0.19, 0.09, and 0.94 eV using the HSE + SOC method agree well with previous works, as shown in Table , further confirming the validity of our approach. In comparison to w-InSb and SnTe, CdTe 2 possesses a wider bandgap, which makes it a suitable candidate for thermoelectric applications across a wide temperature range.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…According to ref. , p‐doping is generally more efficient than n‐doping to enhance the thermoelectric performance of SnTe. Under hydrostatic pressure the band gap shows a minimum at 1.5 GPa and ZT a maximum at 1 GPa (with a value of 1.5 for a hole concentration of 1×1019cm3, for example, as compared to 0.2 at 0 GPa).…”
Section: Te Compoundsmentioning
confidence: 99%