1999
DOI: 10.3892/ijo.14.6.1039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-metastatic Ewing's sarcoma: twenty years of experience suggests that surgery is a prime factor for successful multimodality therapy.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
10
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A recent study by Palta et al [120] found similar results with hyperfractionated and accelerated radiation doses in RIA patients; the overall 5-year survival rate in 14 patients was 86%. Notably, radiotherapy in RIS patients had less impact than chemotherapy because of the patients' tolerance of the radiation dosage from their previous radiotherapy for their breast cancer [121,122]. A second course of radiotherapy raises concerns about toxicities such as rib fracture, pneumonitis, and soft-tissue necrosis.…”
Section: Role Of Radiotherapymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A recent study by Palta et al [120] found similar results with hyperfractionated and accelerated radiation doses in RIA patients; the overall 5-year survival rate in 14 patients was 86%. Notably, radiotherapy in RIS patients had less impact than chemotherapy because of the patients' tolerance of the radiation dosage from their previous radiotherapy for their breast cancer [121,122]. A second course of radiotherapy raises concerns about toxicities such as rib fracture, pneumonitis, and soft-tissue necrosis.…”
Section: Role Of Radiotherapymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FNA cannot be expected to provide definitive information about the histologic architecture of RIS nor can FNA provide adequate material for an immunohistochemical evaluation. Therefore, core needle or incisional biopsies are preferred: they provide accurate and satisfactory sampling [51, [99] 5c Case reports (n ϭ 2) Case report and literature review Velaj and DeLuca (1987) [4] 5c Radiographic review (n ϭ 1) Case report and literature review Olcina et al (2008) [11] 5c Case report (n ϭ 1) Case report and literature review Chahin et al (2001) [14] 5c Case report (n ϭ 1) Case report and literature review Pendlebury et al (1995) [17] 5c [78] 5c Case report (n ϭ 2) Case report and literature review Kunkel et al (2008) [57] 5c Case report (n ϭ 1) Case report and literature review Quadros et al (2006) [80] 5c Case report (n ϭ 1) Case report and literature review Kuten et al (1985) [87] 5c Case report (n ϭ 7) Case report and literature review Khan et al (2009) [88] 5c Case report (n ϭ 1) Case report and literature review Plotti et al (2006) [91] 5c Case report (n ϭ 1) Case report and literature review Brenin et al (1998) [86] 5c Case report (n ϭ 1) Case report and literature review Feigenberg et al (2002) [100] 5c Case report (n ϭ 3) Case report and literature review Schulz et al (2000) [121] 5c Case report (n ϭ 3) Case report and literature review Givens et al (1999) [122] 5c Clinical review (n ϭ 85) Analysis of prognostic factors for RIS Okuno and Edmonson (1998) [113] 5c Case reports (n ϭ 2) Case report and literature review Mano et al (2006) [102] 5c Case report (n ϭ 1) Case report and literature review Perez-Ruiz et al (2009) …”
Section: Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patients who are left with signi;icant amounts of viable tumor in the resected specimen following neoadjuvant chemotherapy that have less than wide surgical margins (14)(15)(16) . In this study, positive surgical margin(s) and larger tumor size (>10 cm) was accompanied by signi;icantly lower disease free and overall survival (p<0.005) (;igure 2) which is consistent with other studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[29][30][31] Use of markers in the specific diagnosis of disease have been considered, 32 but the most researched use of tumour markers has been in the development of prognostic risk groups in order to target therapy. [33][34][35][36][37][38] Use of tumour markers in the monitoring of patients following primary therapy has also been considered. 39,40 Rationale for a systematic review of tumour markers in paediatric oncology A persistent difficulty in conducting primary research in paediatric oncology, not just in relation to the use of tumour markers, is the relatively small number of children who develop disease, and the therefore low statistical power which individual primary studies have of detecting either treatment benefits or survival benefits arising out of prognostic staging (using tumour markers).…”
Section: Use Of Tumour Markers In Paediatric Oncologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[29][30][31] Use of markers in the specific diagnosis of disease have been considered, 32 but the most researched use of tumour markers has been in the development of prognostic risk groups in order to target therapy. [33][34][35][36][37][38] Use of tumour markers in the monitoring of patients following primary therapy has also been considered. …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%