2016
DOI: 10.1017/s0022215116000554
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-melanoma skin cancer: United Kingdom National Multidisciplinary Guidelines

Abstract: This is the official guideline endorsed by the specialty associations involved in the care of head and neck cancer patients in the UK. This paper provides consensus recommendations on the management of cutaneous basal cell carcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma in the head and neck region on the basis of current evidence.Recommendations• Royal College of Pathologists minimum datasets for NMSC should be adhered to in order to improve patient care and help work-force planning in pathology departments. (G)• Tumour… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
160
1
13

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 158 publications
(181 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
7
160
1
13
Order By: Relevance
“…PDT was also proved to be better than the traditional intervention FU [Salim et al, 2003;Morton et al, 2006] with regard to CLC, CLR, CRP, and AEs in treating the SCC subgroup of NMSC. Meanwhile, SE with a predetermined margin is the treatment recommended by United Kingdom National Multidisciplinary Guidelines of NMSC for the majority of both BCCs and SCCs [Newlands et al, 2016], which is also consistent with our study. This might be attributed to the particular patient background (SCC and BD subgroups) in the above publications.…”
Section: Confirmation and Discrepancy From Other Studiessupporting
confidence: 91%
“…PDT was also proved to be better than the traditional intervention FU [Salim et al, 2003;Morton et al, 2006] with regard to CLC, CLR, CRP, and AEs in treating the SCC subgroup of NMSC. Meanwhile, SE with a predetermined margin is the treatment recommended by United Kingdom National Multidisciplinary Guidelines of NMSC for the majority of both BCCs and SCCs [Newlands et al, 2016], which is also consistent with our study. This might be attributed to the particular patient background (SCC and BD subgroups) in the above publications.…”
Section: Confirmation and Discrepancy From Other Studiessupporting
confidence: 91%
“…In those that commented on specific levels, a supraomohyoid neck dissection (levels I‐III) was typically recommended, with level V if the primary CSCC was of the neck or posterior scalp. This is in line with the recently published United Kingdom National Multidisciplinary Guidelines which recommend selective dissection of levels I, II, and III, including external jugular nodes, for cP+N0 head and neck SCC . Ebrahimi et al (the largest cP+N0 series) went on to recommended omission of level I providing disease was not associated with a facial primary CSCC and the perifacial nodes were taken as part of the marginal nerve dissection during parotidectomy …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…The UK National Multidisciplinary Guidelines recommend that non-infiltrative BCCs <2 cm should be excised with a margin of 4–5 mm. Smaller margins (2–3 mm) may be taken in case of limited reconstructive options 23. The involvement of the eyelid margin makes surgical reconstruction more difficult.…”
Section: Treatment Of Periocular Bccmentioning
confidence: 99%