2006
DOI: 10.1039/b513690c
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-matrix matched calibration of major and minor concentrations of Zn and Cu in brass, aluminium and silicate glass using NIR femtosecond laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

4
68
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
(26 reference statements)
4
68
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Differences between certified and measured concentrations of the order of 10-20% were reported, which were four times smaller than values found for UV-ns-LA-ICP-MS using equivalent experimental conditions. Recently, Bian et al [30,31] and Monza et al [32] communicated three studies on "extreme" cases of non-matrix-matched calibration using metal and silicate glass standards. In addition, Horn et al [33] reported on the absence of isotopic fractionation during the isotope ratio analysis of a variety of Fe-containing mineral phases.…”
Section: Analysis Of Laser-produced Aerosols By Icp-msmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Differences between certified and measured concentrations of the order of 10-20% were reported, which were four times smaller than values found for UV-ns-LA-ICP-MS using equivalent experimental conditions. Recently, Bian et al [30,31] and Monza et al [32] communicated three studies on "extreme" cases of non-matrix-matched calibration using metal and silicate glass standards. In addition, Horn et al [33] reported on the absence of isotopic fractionation during the isotope ratio analysis of a variety of Fe-containing mineral phases.…”
Section: Analysis Of Laser-produced Aerosols By Icp-msmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[28][29][30][31][32][33] provides information about the overall fractionation F tot. only, unless pulse energy, fluence, etc.…”
Section: Analysis Of Laser-produced Aerosols By Icp-msmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With femtosecond-pulsed ablation, the irradiated volume can explode (Coulomb explosion) before the photon energy is dissipated as heat in the lattice; melting is reduced (reducing or eliminating melt ejection) and the ablation process could produce a more uniform aerosol compared to nanosecond laser ablation [25]. Improved chemical analysis precision and accuracy by reducing systematic errors related to the particle size distribution and resultant spikes in the transient signal as well as a relaxation of matrix dependence has been shown for the analysis of glass and metal alloy samples when using femtosecond laser pulses [26][27][28][29][30].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It shows better analytical performance form the view of elemental fractionation effects, which show the capability concerning the non-matrix matching calibration method for the quantitative analysis of elements. 32 However, the effect could actually be observed on conductive samples such as metals. The fs-LA does not always show better elemental fractionation on non-conducting materials such as glass, since similar elemental fractionation effects were obtained among 193 nm nanosecond-LA (ns-LA), 265 nm fs-LA and 795 nm fs-LA in our previous study.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%