2006
DOI: 10.1007/11841883_23
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-materialized Model View Specification with Triple Graph Grammars

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Besides these model composition approaches, some dedicated model view approaches are emerging. In [15] the authors introduce, based on Triple Graph Grammars, the possibility to have nonmaterialized views by extending base metamodels using inheritance. In a successor work [2], they present an approach for materialized views without modifying the base metamodels, but requiring to explicitly populate the views via model transformations.…”
Section: State-of-the-artmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Besides these model composition approaches, some dedicated model view approaches are emerging. In [15] the authors introduce, based on Triple Graph Grammars, the possibility to have nonmaterialized views by extending base metamodels using inheritance. In a successor work [2], they present an approach for materialized views without modifying the base metamodels, but requiring to explicitly populate the views via model transformations.…”
Section: State-of-the-artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To tackle such a challenge, several approaches for model composition have already been developed so far, e.g., [2,12,15,17,18]. In short, mostly all of them propose the generation of a completely new composed model automatically populated with elements copied from the set of base models that participate in the composition.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As reported in [24], these incremental techniques are also applicable for views that have been defined for graph pattern matching by the database queries of [25]. The use of non-materialized views have been discussed in [26]. -Triple graph grammar techniques are also used in [27] for tool integration based on UML models.…”
Section: Model Synchronization and Traceability Modelsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…-Vdl [45] is based on the constant-complement approach: information discarded during the transformation is saved as a complement and restored dur- 7 In pure TGG, there must be a bijection between source and target patterns [25]. There are literature on an implementation of a variant of TGG that explicitly address nonbijective usages [34], but formal bidirectional properties were not the scope of the paper. 8 It is possible to use TGG for specifying bidirectional transformations with non-bijective consistency relations [54].…”
Section: Considered Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%