2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2018.05.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-Mass Breast Lesions on Ultrasound: Feature Exploration and Multimode Ultrasonic Diagnosis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
24
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
3
24
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In a study by Zhang et al., among a total of 928 patients with US-detected breast lesions, 79 individuals had lesions recognized as NMLs, 43.7% of which were benign. 20 More recently, a study including 715 NMLs found that 53.8% of the lesions were benign. 19 In our study, palpability was not significantly associated with greater risk of malignancy among NMLs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a study by Zhang et al., among a total of 928 patients with US-detected breast lesions, 79 individuals had lesions recognized as NMLs, 43.7% of which were benign. 20 More recently, a study including 715 NMLs found that 53.8% of the lesions were benign. 19 In our study, palpability was not significantly associated with greater risk of malignancy among NMLs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been reported that both malignant and benign breast lesions can present as NMLs [10,11], accounting for about 9.2% of all breast lesions [11,24]. The features of malignant and benign lesions on conventional US overlap considerably [4,6], resulting in low diagnostic specificity (about 21-43%) [4,15,19].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The qualitative measurement index is simpler, with relatively unified standards based on strain and colour pattern [28]. Typically, the elasticity score, which involves calculating the hard area ratio, is used, as it was in three studies [11,20,29] in our meta-analysis. The cut-off values for diagnosing breast NLMs was an elasticity score of 3 in all cases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There is no standardized guideline for the interpretation and management of non-mass-like lesions, and thus it is currently dependent on operator experience and judgement in individual clinical setting [9]. Recently, attempts to discriminate between benign or malignant non-mass-like lesions based on a combined analysis of B-mode, color Doppler US, strain, or shear wave elastography have consistently demonstrated improved diagnostic performances [1013]. Non-mass-like lesions are known to reflect a broad spectrum of breast pathologies including benign, high-risk, and malignant lesions [14].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%