2001
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-44667-2_4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-Markovian Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A duration of a task can be any number in a given interval (no probability assigned) and the strategy is evaluated according to the worst performance induced by an instance of the external environment. Duration probabilistic automata (DPA) have been introduced in [18] to express stochastic scheduling problems and evaluate the expected performance of schedulers by methods similar to techniques used for generalized semi-Markov processes (GSMP) [10,11,7] such as [6,2]. This approach refines the successor operator used in the verification of timed automata [9,15] from a zone transformer into a density transformer and can compute, for example, the time distribution of reaching the final state and hence the expected termination time under a given scheduler.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A duration of a task can be any number in a given interval (no probability assigned) and the strategy is evaluated according to the worst performance induced by an instance of the external environment. Duration probabilistic automata (DPA) have been introduced in [18] to express stochastic scheduling problems and evaluate the expected performance of schedulers by methods similar to techniques used for generalized semi-Markov processes (GSMP) [10,11,7] such as [6,2]. This approach refines the successor operator used in the verification of timed automata [9,15] from a zone transformer into a density transformer and can compute, for example, the time distribution of reaching the final state and hence the expected termination time under a given scheduler.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In past years, several classes of non-Markovian approaches have been defined [BT98], such as Semi-Markov Stochastic Petri Net (SMSPN's) [CGL94], Markov Regenerative Stochastic Petri Nets (MRSPN's) [CKT94] and Deterministic and Stochastic Petri Nets (DSPN's) [AC87]. Some major methods for analytically solving the non-Markovian models are discussed in [BPTT98,MFT00,Ger01]. A short survey on State-Based Stochastic Methods and automated supporting tools for the assisted construction and solution of dependability models can be found in [BCG05].…”
Section: Stochastic Model-based Approaches For Early Prediction Of Dementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, in earlier works we have observed that empirical characterizations for both task service times and task transfer times that were obtained from actual DCSs follow power-law distributions like the Pareto distribution [16], [29]. Moreover, researchers have shown that Markovian models may introduce significant errors on the calculation of performance and reliability metrics [16], [25]. In particular, in [16], we showed by means of Monte-Carlo (MC) simulations that the service reliability of a DCS calculated under the Markovian assumption can be highly inaccurate in settings where the average task-transfer delays are large compared to the average task service times.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, modeling and analysis of non-Markovian queuing systems has been conducted in terms of nonMarkovian stochastic Petri Nets [4], [24], [25], [26], [27], [28]. In these works non-Markovian stochastic Petri Nets have been developed and their capabilities have been exploited to model the performance of web server networks [26], queues of embedded systems [26], [27] and the queues of two network terminals [28] among other applications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%