2020
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.124.123902
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-Lorentzian Local Density of States in Coupled Photonic Crystal Cavities Probed by Near- and Far-Field Emission

Abstract: DOI to the publisher's website. • The final author version and the galley proof are versions of the publication after peer review. • The final published version features the final layout of the paper including the volume, issue and page numbers. Link to publication General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition to generating subradiance or superradiance, the CDOS contribution in the interferometric emission process may also influence the spectral lineshape. An interesting situation is that of two coupled photonic cavities generating a LDOS with a non-Lorentzian spectrum, which can be achieved by selecting two L3 cavities with unbalanced losses [28]. This situation goes beyond the high-Q model used above, and the expansion (18) for the LDOS and CDOS has to be replaced by a more general expansion in QNMs (for an introduction to QNMs in photonics, see for example [27]).…”
Section: B Coupled Cavities With Non-lorentzian Spectrummentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to generating subradiance or superradiance, the CDOS contribution in the interferometric emission process may also influence the spectral lineshape. An interesting situation is that of two coupled photonic cavities generating a LDOS with a non-Lorentzian spectrum, which can be achieved by selecting two L3 cavities with unbalanced losses [28]. This situation goes beyond the high-Q model used above, and the expansion (18) for the LDOS and CDOS has to be replaced by a more general expansion in QNMs (for an introduction to QNMs in photonics, see for example [27]).…”
Section: B Coupled Cavities With Non-lorentzian Spectrummentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This result can be easily understood by formulating Equations (1) and (2) in terms of Fano asymmetry parameters, following the approach of ref. [31]. It is lengthy but straightforward (see Supporting Information) to show (here: ε=false(ωXωnfalse)/normalΓn) truerightγ()ωX,boldr=leftnγn()ωX,boldr=leftn0.33em6πc3εoωX2εboldr1/2γX||trueEnboldr·u2normalΓnFqn()r()ε truerightnormalΔω()ωX,boldr=leftnnormalΔωn()ωX,boldr=leftn0.33em3πc3εoωX2εboldr1/2γX||trueEnboldr·u2normalΓnFqn()r()ε ...…”
Section: Vacuum Optical Trapmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The two Fano parameters qnfalse(boldrfalse)and qnfalse(boldrfalse) for Purcell effect and resonant Lamb shift are interconnected, both associated to the spatial phase of the n ‐th QNM, which is fully defined by the normalization and it is a physical observable. [ 25,31 ] qnboldr=Re()boldEn-0.16em()r·bolduIm()boldEn-0.16em()r·boldu;qnboldr=1qnboldr1+qnboldr…”
Section: Vacuum Optical Trapmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations