1987
DOI: 10.1088/0022-3735/20/10/034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-linearity in length measurement using heterodyne laser Michelson interferometry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
45
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…COS0B (26) By insertion of Eqs. (22), (24), (25), and (26) This term is two orders of magnitude smaller than the intended uncertainty (a few parts in 10") in the lattice spacing comparison and is therefore neglected in the following.…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…COS0B (26) By insertion of Eqs. (22), (24), (25), and (26) This term is two orders of magnitude smaller than the intended uncertainty (a few parts in 10") in the lattice spacing comparison and is therefore neglected in the following.…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This reduction approach is based on the quality of the coaxial beam's source frequency orthogonality together with the quality of the linear polarizations. If these are of high quality, it is also essential that highquality polarized optics are applied for beam splitting, combined with alignment [5][6][7][8][9].A less expensive approach is to digitally compensate for the PNL through analytical modeling [5,[9][10][11]. The advantage of this method is that it typically ensures PNL below 1 nm for small system imperfections, without changing the interferometer configuration.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This reduction approach is based on the quality of the coaxial beam's source frequency orthogonality together with the quality of the linear polarizations. If these are of high quality, it is also essential that highquality polarized optics are applied for beam splitting, combined with alignment [5][6][7][8][9].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, some error sources remain, one of which is periodic nonlinearity (PNL). This error source is attributed by ghost reflections, by imperfections in polarization alignment, and by the polarization quality of both the source frequencies and polarizing optics [5][6][7][8][9].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%