2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.talanta.2006.10.036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-linear regression methods in NIRS quantitative analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
58
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 119 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
58
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Its usefulness has already been proven for the prediction of chemical and physical characteristics of meat and meat products and for various classification purposes (for review see Škorjanc, 2004 andPrieto, Roehe, Lavín, Batten, &Andrés, 2009). NIR spectral information demands multivariate data analysis due to its complexity (Pérez-Marín, Garrido-Varo, & Guerrero, 2007). Artificial intelligent methods are often applied for the classification since their primary target is to distinguish objects or groups or populations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Its usefulness has already been proven for the prediction of chemical and physical characteristics of meat and meat products and for various classification purposes (for review see Škorjanc, 2004 andPrieto, Roehe, Lavín, Batten, &Andrés, 2009). NIR spectral information demands multivariate data analysis due to its complexity (Pérez-Marín, Garrido-Varo, & Guerrero, 2007). Artificial intelligent methods are often applied for the classification since their primary target is to distinguish objects or groups or populations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…KPLS differs from the previously mentioned nonlinear PLS algorithms [18][19][20], in that the original input data in space R are nonlinearly transformed into a feature space F of arbitrary dimensionality via nonlinear mapping UðxÞ, then a linear PLS model is created in feature space. The nonlinear transformation effect can be completed only by dot product as described in Eq.…”
Section: Appendix a Kernel Partial Least Squaresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(iii) According to the results shown in Tables 2 and 3, it is indicated that, even though SPLS has the best prediction performance to the NIR experiment data of simulated physiological solution samples in vitro, it seems that SPLS is not always has good performance, especially for the complex NIR data of human noninvasive measurement experiment in vivo. Under the hybrid nonlinear modeling strategy of mUVE-KPLS with Gaussian kernel, the best prediction accuracy is got and the RMSEP is 9.4 mg dL À1 , which is increased by19.7% compared with linear model. However, under the modeling strategy of mUVE-SPLS, the RMSEP is 11.4 mg dL À1 , which is increased slightly by 2.6% compared with linear model.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, more samples (101) from five different typical cultivated areas were collected to develop NIR models. Different regression methods were compared by PLS, PCR, and stepwise multivariate linear regression (SMLR) for NIR quantitative analysis [31]. Various pretreatment methods such as derivatives (1st and 2nd), multiplicative scatter correction (MSC), standard normal variate (SNV), Savitzky-Golay filter, and Norris derivative filter were used to obtain the optimized models for gallic acid, catechin, albiflorin, and paeoniflorin, respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%