Volume 8: Ocean Renewable Energy 2013
DOI: 10.1115/omae2013-11247
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-Linear Model Predictive Control Applied to a Generic Ocean-Wave Energy Extractor

Abstract: This paper evaluates the theoretical application of nonlinear model predictive control (NMPC) to a model-scale point absorber for wave energy conversion. The NMPC strategy will be evaluated against a passive system, which utilizes no controller, using a performance metric based on the absorbed energy. The NMPC strategy was set up as a non-linear optimization problem utilizing IPOPT package to obtain a time varying optimal generator damping from the power-take-off (PTO) unit. This formulation is different from … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

2
25
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These papers acknowledge that practical constraints imposed by the PTO system must be studied to a greater extent. Similar conclusions are drawn by [11], which demonstrates the potentials of MPC in a simulation study of a model-scale point absorber albeit unrealistic performance requirements for the PTO system are obtained due to the simplicity of the used PTO model. [10] reports a study of both a centralized MPC and decentralized MPCs applied to a small array of three WECs and concludes that MPC can improve the energy absorption compared to a linear fixed damping controller.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 77%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These papers acknowledge that practical constraints imposed by the PTO system must be studied to a greater extent. Similar conclusions are drawn by [11], which demonstrates the potentials of MPC in a simulation study of a model-scale point absorber albeit unrealistic performance requirements for the PTO system are obtained due to the simplicity of the used PTO model. [10] reports a study of both a centralized MPC and decentralized MPCs applied to a small array of three WECs and concludes that MPC can improve the energy absorption compared to a linear fixed damping controller.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Recently, WPEA's based on the idea of Model Predictive Control (MPC) have attained increasing focus from the wave energy research community, see e.g., [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11], and initial results are encouraging: MPC may lead to increased energy output of a WEC compared to e.g., reactive control WPEA. In the early work of [4,6,8], a linear MPC has been developed and simulated on ideal PTO systems harvesting energy of point absorber WEC's.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The use of model-predictive control (MPC) allows for the optimization over any number of state constraints, such as the amplitude of motion [25], [26] or power-takeoff (PTO) capacity [27]. Nonlinear-model-predictive control (NMPC) has also been used to account for the nonlinear dynamics from mooring lines [28] as well as the optimization of a time-varying PTO damper [29], [30]. However, the results from [29] include an active control force in addition to a time-varying PTO damper that allows for energy flow reversal, whereas Tom and Yeung [30] rely on the time-varying PTO damping as the only control input preventing a reverse in energy flow.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonlinear-model-predictive control (NMPC) has also been used to account for the nonlinear dynamics from mooring lines [28] as well as the optimization of a time-varying PTO damper [29], [30]. However, the results from [29] include an active control force in addition to a time-varying PTO damper that allows for energy flow reversal, whereas Tom and Yeung [30] rely on the time-varying PTO damping as the only control input preventing a reverse in energy flow. The results from both sources suggest a damping input following a strongly bang-bang time history [31].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%