2013 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing 2013
DOI: 10.1109/icassp.2013.6639207
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-linear frequency warping for VTLN using subglottal resonances and the third formant frequency

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

4
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 1 shows the word error rates (WERs) obtained by applying VTLN and SGR warping individually, and in combination. As found in [3], SGR warping by itself does slightly better than VTLN. The more interesting observation, however, is that the WER reductions provided by VTLN (8.7%) and SGR warping (13.0%) are almost additive, as realized by the proposed joint-warping approach.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 52%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Table 1 shows the word error rates (WERs) obtained by applying VTLN and SGR warping individually, and in combination. As found in [3], SGR warping by itself does slightly better than VTLN. The more interesting observation, however, is that the WER reductions provided by VTLN (8.7%) and SGR warping (13.0%) are almost additive, as realized by the proposed joint-warping approach.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 52%
“…Therefore, the search grid G k consists of 27 points. The a priori reference SGRs are: Sg1 = 601 Hz, Sg2 = 1419 Hz, Sg3 = 2304 Hz (see [3] for an explanation of how these numbers are obtained from an independent database of subglottal acoustics). Table 1 shows the word error rates (WERs) obtained by applying VTLN and SGR warping individually, and in combination.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations