Non–Laryngeal Mask Airway Supraglottic Airway Devices

Cook, Tim; Hagberg, Carin A.

doi:10.1016/b978-1-4377-2764-7.00023-3

Cited by 5 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 210 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…There is a soft, elliptical airway opening at the distal end which provides patency of seal against gastric overflow. 8, 9 There are no studies comparing Supreme LMA, I gel and Baska mask in the Indian population. Therefore, this randomized controlled study was aimed to compare the clinical performance of Supreme LMA, I gel and Baska mask.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparative evaluation of the clinical performance of supraglottic airways- Supreme laryngeal mask airway, I gel and baska mask

Phalgune¹,

Cherian²,

Thatte³

et al. 2023

IJCA

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

There are no studies comparing Supreme laryngeal mask airway (LMA), I gel and Baska mask in Indian population. A comparison of the clinical performance of Supreme LMA, I gel and Baska mask was undertaken in this randomized controlled study.The present research was undertaken in 75 patients aged 18 to 60 years who underwent elective surgery for less than 3-hour duration under general anaesthesia. The patients were randomly divided into three groups; Supreme LMA, I gel, and Baska mask. The oropharyngeal leak pressure (OLP) after 30 minutes to loss of spontaneous respiration was the primary objective, whereas the secondary objectives were attempts required for insertion of LMA, ease of gastric tube insertion, time required for gastric tube insertion and post-operative morbidity. The mean OLP of Baska mask group was (28.2 cm HO) as compared to Supreme LMA (25.3 cm HO) and I-gel (24.1 cm HO) groups (p-value = 0.0001). The mean gastric tube insertion time of Baska mask group was (20.7 s) as compared to Supreme LMA (6.7 s) and I-gel (9.6 s) groups (p-value = 0.0001). The three groups were comparable with regards to the number of attempts required, ease of gastric tube insertion and post-operative morbidity.A higher OLP was observed in Baska mass group as compared to Supreme LMA and I-gel. The three devices were similar in terms of attempts required for insertion, ease of gastric tube insertion and post-operative morbidity.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparative evaluation of the clinical performance of supraglottic airways- Supreme laryngeal mask airway, I gel and baska mask

Phalgune¹,

Cherian²,

Thatte³

et al. 2023

IJCA

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…A detailed discussion of the wide range of devices and techniques is beyond the scope of this article but may be found elsewhere. [6][7][8] …”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Strengths and Limitations of Airway Techniques

Cooper

2015

Anesthesiology Clinics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A systematic review and meta-analysis on the efficacy and safety of the Baska mask versus other laryngeal mask airways during general anaesthesia

Fadlalmola,

Elhusein,

Osman

et al. 2023

Journal of Perioperative Practice

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: The Baska mask is a supraglottic airway device used during general anaesthesia that combines features from various other devices. This systematic review aims to compare its efficacy and safety with other laryngeal mask airways. Methods: Randomised controlled trials were identified by searching PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science and Cochrane Library. RevMan software was used for meta-analysis, with mean difference and risk ratios calculated for continuous and dichotomous data, respectively, along with a 95% confidence interval. Results: The meta-analysis found that the Baska mask provides a better oropharyngeal seal pressure (mean difference = 7.03; 95% confidence interval = [6.00, 8.07], p < 0.00001) and a higher rate of maximal seal pressure (risk ratio = 18.38; 95% confidence interval = [2.53, 133.47], p = 0.004) compared to other laryngeal mask airways. However, the Baska mask had lower success rates in first-attempt insertion (risk ratio = 0.79; 95% confidence interval = [0.72, 0.86], p < 0.00001) and higher rates of insertion manipulation (risk ratio = 16.64; 95% confidence interval = [5.86, 47.24], p < 0.00001). Conclusion: The Baska mask offers better oropharyngeal seal pressure, but may be more difficult to insert than other laryngeal mask airways, without causing significant delays. The Baska mask appears as safe as other laryngeal mask airways, but larger trials are needed to support these findings.

show abstract

Non–Laryngeal Mask Airway Supraglottic Airway Devices

Cited by 5 publications

References 210 publications

Comparative evaluation of the clinical performance of supraglottic airways- Supreme laryngeal mask airway, I gel and baska mask

Comparative evaluation of the clinical performance of supraglottic airways- Supreme laryngeal mask airway, I gel and baska mask

Strengths and Limitations of Airway Techniques

A systematic review and meta-analysis on the efficacy and safety of the Baska mask versus other laryngeal mask airways during general anaesthesia

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About