2021
DOI: 10.1109/tpwrs.2020.3003367
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-Iterative Semi-Implicit Integration Method for Active Distribution Networks With a High Penetration of Distributed Generations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The history current sources of the BLM between subsystems m and n are given by the following equations. Here, both 𝜏 mn and 𝜏 nm denote the propagation delay of the BLM between subsystems m and n, thus, 𝜏 mn = 𝜏 nm ; i ′ m (t − 𝜏 mn ) and i ′ n (t − 𝜏 nm ) denote the variables without interaction of the BLMs inside subsystems m and n, respectively; i ′′ m (t − 𝜏 mn ) represents the interface variables transferred from the subsystem n to m, and vice versa is represented by the vector i ′′ n (t − 𝜏 nm ); D 1 t , D 2 t , D 3 t , and D 4 t are the coefficient vectors, whose expressions can be found in [19] and are not included due to space limitations.…”
Section: Network Decompositionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The history current sources of the BLM between subsystems m and n are given by the following equations. Here, both 𝜏 mn and 𝜏 nm denote the propagation delay of the BLM between subsystems m and n, thus, 𝜏 mn = 𝜏 nm ; i ′ m (t − 𝜏 mn ) and i ′ n (t − 𝜏 nm ) denote the variables without interaction of the BLMs inside subsystems m and n, respectively; i ′′ m (t − 𝜏 mn ) represents the interface variables transferred from the subsystem n to m, and vice versa is represented by the vector i ′′ n (t − 𝜏 nm ); D 1 t , D 2 t , D 3 t , and D 4 t are the coefficient vectors, whose expressions can be found in [19] and are not included due to space limitations.…”
Section: Network Decompositionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the increasing penetration of distributed generators (DGs) and energy storage systems, power distribution systems have evolved from passive networks to active distribution networks (ADNs) [1,2]. Although this transition has paved the way for more sustainable power grids, it poses challenges to the secure and stable operation of power systems [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While authors in Reference 40 presented a proposed controller based on STATCOM for the PVGUs called PV‐STATCOM to provide fast frequency response and ensure damping in power oscillation to enhance system stability. Authors in Reference 41 improved the system stability by integrating the DGs in the LVDNs based on an adaptive Jacobian matrix to solve the differential equations of the connected DGs to support active power and eliminate disturbance. In Reference 42, a novel frequency regulation method is introduced based on the droop control and virtual inertia control to improve the system stability, enhance the frequency response, and obtain convenient accuracy and tracking speed.…”
Section: Impact Of Excessive Penetration Of Pv Systems In Lvdnsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can provide the voltage support and improve the controllability of DN, which creates a large and adjustable space for optimization. Active distribution network (ADN) is the future form of DN, which is a technical way to integrate DG and improve the intelligence of DN (Liu et al, 2021;Xiao et al, 2021). The ADN is not only a DN with DG but also has a number of controllable devices and a variety of control strategies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%