2016
DOI: 10.1007/12_2015_344
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-isothermal Crystallization of Semi-Crystalline Polymers: The Influence of Cooling Rate and Pressure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 102 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This demonstrates an advantage of our fluorescence technique over conventional DSC, that is, this fluorescence technique is capable of monitoring nonisothermal crystallization at faster cooling rates that are more relevant to the industrial polymer processing (e.g., injection molding, film blowing, and fiber spinning) conditions. [ 4 ]…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This demonstrates an advantage of our fluorescence technique over conventional DSC, that is, this fluorescence technique is capable of monitoring nonisothermal crystallization at faster cooling rates that are more relevant to the industrial polymer processing (e.g., injection molding, film blowing, and fiber spinning) conditions. [ 4 ]…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been well established in the literature that the crystallinity attainable during nonisothermal crystallization typically decreases with increasing cooling rate. [ 4 ] As the crystallinity increases in the CN‐PLLA matrix, the rigidity or density of the local environment that surrounds the CN4OH dye labels is enhanced; and thus, the intramolecular motions (e.g., rotation) of these AIE luminogens are restricted by the neighboring crystals formed, which in turn promotes the radiative fluorescence emission. [ 42 ] A more detailed discussion on the correlation between the degree of crystallinity and fluorescence behavior will be provided in Section 3.1.3 below.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Investigations by Assmussen [33,34] showed that the compressibility decreases with the degree of branching of the polymers due to the hindered crystallization. Investigations by Drongelen et al [29] on iPP homopolymers at pressures of 5 and 25 MPa and cooling rates of 0.1 to 2.0 K/s showed that the formation of αand γ-phases always occurs combined with the γ-phase being formed preferentially at high pressures and decreasing cooling rates, as also described elsewhere [31,35,36]. In summary, for the formation of the crystalline phase in iPP, this means that the mesophase is preferentially formed at high cooling rates and low pressures, the α-phase at low cooling rates and low pressure, and the γ-phase at low cooling rates and high pressure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Further studies focused on the effect of pressure on the crystallization [28][29][30][31][32]. Investigations by Assmussen [33,34] showed that the compressibility decreases with the degree of branching of the polymers due to the hindered crystallization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are numerous papers devoted to the modeling and the analysis of the crystallization kinetics [24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35], most of which are based on the Avrami-type models [36][37][38][39] under isothermal condition, or on Nakamura and Ozawa's equation for nonisothermal crystallization [40][41][42]. Specifically, the modified factors related to mechanical properties [24][25][26][27] have also included the effect of flow on the crystallization. The influence of the temperature gradient [29] and the confined volume [31][32][33][43][44][45][46] on the crystallization have also been further discussed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%