1994
DOI: 10.1252/jcej.27.45
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-isothermal Adsorption of Nitrogen-carbon Dioxide Mixture in a Fixed Bed of Zeolite-X.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
11
0
1

Year Published

1995
1995
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The adsorption capacity at 0.15 bar is about 3 mol/kg [13], which is comparable to the best amine-based solid sorbents. The CO 2 /N 2 selectivity of NaX is also extremely high, above 100 [14]. Similar results are obtained for zeolite 5A [15].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…The adsorption capacity at 0.15 bar is about 3 mol/kg [13], which is comparable to the best amine-based solid sorbents. The CO 2 /N 2 selectivity of NaX is also extremely high, above 100 [14]. Similar results are obtained for zeolite 5A [15].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…16,21,[23][24][25] Although the heat released in a adsorption process is expected to be small in bench-scale experiments, 17 heat management in such TSA processes has to be addressed in practical, large-scale applications. [26][27][28][29][30] Only few studies 17,[26][27][28][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37] have investigated the role of heat effects on the adsorption performance of solid sorbents. Moreover, considering the substantial energy required to regenerate the chemisorbents, heat integration 38,39 is needed in the entire TSA process to minimize the overall energy penalty.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the research in adsorption is focussed on pressure/vacuum swing adsorption for separating CO 2 (15% by vol) from flue gas in power stations that use coal as fuel (Zhang et al 2008;Reynolds et al 2008Reynolds et al , 2006Reynolds et al , 2005Franchi et al 2005;Golden et al 2003;Ko et al 2003;Gomes and Yee 2002;Takamura et al 2001aTakamura et al , 2001bZhang et al 1998;Ishibashi et al 1996;Chue et al 1995;Ruthven et al 1994;Kikkinides and Yang 1993). Kim et al 1994 reported that PSA process was uneconomical for the removal of CO 2 in a low concentration range (5-15 vol%) from power stations that use oil or natural gas as fuels. For this CO 2 concentration range, higher economic penalties may be needed to attain lower adsorbent regeneration pressures as in a Vacuum Pressure Swing Adsorption (VPSA) system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%