2020
DOI: 10.1186/s13054-020-03054-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-invasive ventilation in the treatment of early hypoxemic respiratory failure caused by COVID-19: considering nasal CPAP as the first choice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0
3

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
18
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…NIV use was limited in the US and Europe owing to concerns over disease transmission and questionable efficacy in ARDS 119120. In China, on the other hand, NIV was used as the initial strategy between 57% and 85% of the time,121122123 and to date no clear evidence shows increased disease transmission to healthcare workers 122124…”
Section: Respiratory Care For Severe Covid-19 Pneumoniamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…NIV use was limited in the US and Europe owing to concerns over disease transmission and questionable efficacy in ARDS 119120. In China, on the other hand, NIV was used as the initial strategy between 57% and 85% of the time,121122123 and to date no clear evidence shows increased disease transmission to healthcare workers 122124…”
Section: Respiratory Care For Severe Covid-19 Pneumoniamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Já os autores Guan et al (2020), mostram que o CPAP pode ser considerado como primeira alternativa, ele relata que a pressão positiva continua parece ser mais vantajoso quando aplicado no primeiro momento, mas, em contra partida aumenta os riscos de transmissão, no qual as evidencias ainda são muito controversas no que desrespeita a VMI e a VNI. Segundo Castoñón-Gonzáles et al (2020), a ventilação mecânica simultânea de paciente na terapia intensiva pode ser mais vantajosa, no estudo ele traz até quatro vias simultâneas, mas chega a uma conclusão de que pode ser mais eficaz utilizando em apenas duas na unidade de terapia intensiva, ainda no estudo é evidente que a PEEP programada não demonstra diferença em relação ao pulmão, e ainda é relevante pois leva o dobro de acesso ao dispositivo, mas existe uma complexibilidade durante a monitorização e as conexões entre si.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…HFNC respiratory support system allows COVID-19 patients to turn into the prone position three times a day, thus a manoeuvre that helps the patients in improving oxygenation. Non-invasive ventilation (NIV) and high flow nasal oxygen (HFO) breathing assistants have been used to manage acute hypoxemic respiratory failure caused by COVID-19 [ 63 , 64 ].…”
Section: Supportive Wearable Devices For Covid-19 Patientsmentioning
confidence: 99%