2005
DOI: 10.1113/expphysiol.2005.030262
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non‐invasive pulsatile arterial pressure and stroke volume changes from the human finger

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
273
1
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 348 publications
(285 citation statements)
references
References 104 publications
4
273
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Rather than absolute values, in particular, relative changes in BP and stroke volume levels within an individual over time are most reliably measured by the Finometer device. 26,27 Throughout the experiment, we controlled for that the hand position was stable. After the baseline recording, the subjects were exposed to a standardized experimental stress protocol known as Trier Social Stress Test (TSST).…”
Section: Experimental Stress Protocolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rather than absolute values, in particular, relative changes in BP and stroke volume levels within an individual over time are most reliably measured by the Finometer device. 26,27 Throughout the experiment, we controlled for that the hand position was stable. After the baseline recording, the subjects were exposed to a standardized experimental stress protocol known as Trier Social Stress Test (TSST).…”
Section: Experimental Stress Protocolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Noninvasive arterial BP waveform was recorded continuously using volume‐clamp photoplethysmography through a finger cuff, which is part of the Finapres™ system (Finapres Medical Systems, Amsterdam, The Netherlands) 18. All raw data including BP waveforms were used to derive real‐time autonomic indices by a NeuroScope using the VaguSoft™ software (Medifit Instruments Ltd, London, UK).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…40 The Modelflow method assumes a population average of aortic area depending on gender, age, height and weight. Several studies have validated the Modelflow method compared with standard invasive techniques and indicate that this method provides a reliable estimate of changes in cardiac output in a variety of physiological 41 and pathological 42,43 conditions.…”
Section: Methodological Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%