2019
DOI: 10.1111/1365-2478.12809
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non‐invasive lab test in the monitoring of vadose zone contaminated by light non‐aqueous phase liquid

Abstract: We discuss a strategy capable of a quantitative long‐term monitoring of water saturation and volume variation of light non‐aqueous phase liquids in the soil. The goal was reached monitoring a controlled sand cell contaminated with classical gasoline over 124 days, using geophysical methods such as electrical resistivity tomography, induced polarization and ground penetrating radar. We show that empirical relations, linking the water saturation to the physical parameters measured as resistivity from electrical … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the one hand, ERT is easy to operate and highly precise. The data are detailed, clear, and sensitive to NAPL(non-aqueous phase liquids) [45]. On the other hand, the application of ERT in quickly detecting pesticide leakage pollution is still rare and the delineation of pollutants is not perfect, which needs to be further studied.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the one hand, ERT is easy to operate and highly precise. The data are detailed, clear, and sensitive to NAPL(non-aqueous phase liquids) [45]. On the other hand, the application of ERT in quickly detecting pesticide leakage pollution is still rare and the delineation of pollutants is not perfect, which needs to be further studied.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They allow for quasi-continuous monitoring of the entire DNAPL mass without disturbing the flow dynamics. Geophysical methods, such as X-ray tomography (e.g., [15]), electrical resistivity tomography (e.g., [16,17]) and magnetic resonance imaging (e.g., [18]) have been used. They are powerful yet technically demanding and can suffer from calibration and interpretation uncertainties [14,19,20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%