2021
DOI: 10.1177/0300060520984915
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-invasive high-frequency oscillatory ventilation in preterm infants after extubation: a randomized, controlled trial

Abstract: Objective To investigate the effectiveness and safety of non-invasive high-frequency oscillatory ventilation (NHFOV) in post-extubation preterm infants. Methods This was a randomized, controlled trial. A total of 149 preterm infants aged between 25 to 34 weeks’ gestational age with a birth weight of <1500 g who required invasive mechanical ventilation on admission were included. After extubation, they were randomized to the NHFOV group (n = 47), nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) group… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

5
34
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
5
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Literature has reported that NHFOV reduced the incidence of reintubation in infants with difficulties in extubation due to BPD or other conditions (10,11). Our trial also found a lower reintubation rate and a lower BPD rate in the NHFOV group (5). Research regarding the safety of NHFOV showed the risks of brain injury, NEC, ROP, and air leak did not increase in preterm infants who received NHFOV, which was compatible with the results of our trial (10, 12).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Literature has reported that NHFOV reduced the incidence of reintubation in infants with difficulties in extubation due to BPD or other conditions (10,11). Our trial also found a lower reintubation rate and a lower BPD rate in the NHFOV group (5). Research regarding the safety of NHFOV showed the risks of brain injury, NEC, ROP, and air leak did not increase in preterm infants who received NHFOV, which was compatible with the results of our trial (10, 12).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…Research involving the influence of NHFOV on the risks of PVL or IVH is rare (19). In our trial, the incidence of severe IVH (grade III and above) is similar in the NHFOV group compared with the NIPPV group and the NCPAP group (5). When followed for 24-month CA, the neurodevelopmental outcomes remained reassuring in the NHFOV group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…We speculate that the effect of the oscillations may be counteracted by slightly smaller V T during nHFOV, ultimately leading to the same amount of CO 2 removal during the two modes of respiratory support. (4) In selected situations, for example, post-extubation or as primary respiratory support after birth, the small benefits detected in this study may be sufficient to explain the superiority of nHFOV seen in smaller clinical trials 35–38. Finally, we speculate that an increased aeration homogeneity may be associated with a reduced rate of lung injury after long-term use of nHFOV, as reported by a small preclinical study 39.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…Mean airway pressure was remain constant in ( nasal HFOV 5.72±0.17 vs. 5.71±0.26 NIPPV ) in two groups of our study, in contrast (10.9 ± 2.06) to other previous studies 22 .Our study did not show any major difference in the duration of non-invasive ventilation among preterm neonates, however oxygen supplementation was significantly low in nasal HFOV 35.7% than NIPPV 64.3% ,(p= .019).In contrast to NCPAP ,Malakianet al ,was shown contrast difference in duration of non-invasive ventilation in nasal HFOV (p=0.01) among 28 wk till 34 wk GA neonates, 23 whereas no difference in need of mechanical ventilation .Li Y et al stated that nasal HFOV was seen effective in decreasing non-invasive ventilation period, in preterm with GA <34 wk as an extubation respiratory support. 24 Zhu et al also studied the same GA 28WK-34wk as we did in our study ,for nasal HFOV and NCPAP as an initial respiratory support ,mechanical ventilation need was( p<0.01),hence period of non-invasive ventilation was not elicted. 10 It was seen in our study that oxygen supplementation was significantly decreased in nasal HFOV 35.7% than NIPPV 64.3%.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 57%