2011
DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehr173
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-invasive estimation of pulmonary vascular resistance with cardiac magnetic resonance

Abstract: The study comprised 100 consecutive patients with known or suspected pulmonary hypertension (PH; 53 ± 16 years, 73% women) who underwent same-day right heart catheterization (RHC) and CMR. Increased PVR was defined from RHC as >3 WU (n = 66, 66%). From CMR cine and phase-contrast images, right ventricular (RV) volumes and ejection fraction (RVEF), pulmonary artery (PA) flow velocities and areas, and cardiac output were quantified. The best statistical model to estimate PVR was obtained from a derivation cohort… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

5
79
2
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(89 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
5
79
2
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The linearity of the RVEF-R relationship for RVEF >35% is consistent with the linear relationship observed in mild and moderate PAH. 11 Similar to the linear-R model, the mixed linear model is consistent with the curvilinear RVEF-C relationship observed by Stevens et al 18 In Table 1, we summarize strengths and weaknesses of the three models on the basis of clinical evidence. In Figure 2, we directly compare the results from our models with the empirical correlations derived from the limited clinical data available.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 69%
“…The linearity of the RVEF-R relationship for RVEF >35% is consistent with the linear relationship observed in mild and moderate PAH. 11 Similar to the linear-R model, the mixed linear model is consistent with the curvilinear RVEF-C relationship observed by Stevens et al 18 In Table 1, we summarize strengths and weaknesses of the three models on the basis of clinical evidence. In Figure 2, we directly compare the results from our models with the empirical correlations derived from the limited clinical data available.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 69%
“…23 Thus, an alternative approach is desirable, and several adult CMR studies have shown that septal curvature correlates well with pulmonary artery pressure. 2,5,6,8,9,[24][25][26][27] However, this is the first pediatric CMR study to investigate the relationship between septal curvature and pulmonary hemodynamics. Furthermore, it is the first study to compare septal curvature with simultaneously acquired pulmonary hemodynamic data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PVR was finally calculated by subtraction of calculated PCWP from calculated mPAP divided by cardiac output as determined by phase-contrast imaging in the pulmonary artery. For estimated PVR, the authors found limits of agreement ranging between -5.1 and + 4.6 wood units, which were slightly narrower than those of the validation group in the study of Garcia-Alvarez et al [52,53]. Kreitner et al used a phase-contrast sequence with high temporal resolution in the main pulmonary artery for the assessment of hemodynamics in patients with CTEPH.…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Actually, there are three published MR-based approaches for noninvasive assessment of mPAP and/or PVR ( • " Table 1). Garcia-Alvarez et al presented an MR-based method for the assessment of pulmonary vascular resistance using a derivation and validation cohort with different forms of pulmonary hypertension [52]. Their statistical model is based on standard cine and phase-contrast sequences.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%