2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2016.05.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation Improves Paretic Limb Force Production: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
27
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
1
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1000 bootstrap samples of 15 and 30 individuals (i.e. 45,000 resamples in total) were analysed, reflecting sample sizes typically observed in tDCS studies [40,50]. Each iteration of resampling randomly drew individuals from the original sample (N=50) with replacement.…”
Section: Reproducibility Of Left M1 Intensities With Typical Sample-smentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1000 bootstrap samples of 15 and 30 individuals (i.e. 45,000 resamples in total) were analysed, reflecting sample sizes typically observed in tDCS studies [40,50]. Each iteration of resampling randomly drew individuals from the original sample (N=50) with replacement.…”
Section: Reproducibility Of Left M1 Intensities With Typical Sample-smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With smaller sample sizes (~15-30 individuals) commonly used in basic and translational tDCS studies [40,50,53], this heterogeneity can result in cohorts with entirely different stimulation profiles. Bootstrapped samples illustrated that, on average, for smaller samples the overall intensities in left M1 can vary substantially from our larger population mean.…”
Section: Dose-control Reduces Variance In E-field Intensities At a Comentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LF-rTMS has been shown to reduce interhemispheric inhibition and lead to an increased activation of the lesioned cortex in correlation with functional improvement in chronic stroke patients (Ayache et al 2012). A recent meta-analysis by Kang et al (2016) evaluated the efficacy of non-invasive brain stimulation techniques (rTMS and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)) on improving force production capability in paretic limbs of stroke patients and concluded that tDCS and rTMS protocols (increasing cortical excitability in the ipsilesional hemisphere via anodal tDCS and HF-rTMS; and decreasing cortical excitability in the contralesional hemisphere via cathodal tDCS and LF-rTMS) successfully improved paretic limb force production capabilities. Based on these findings, we applied LF-rTMS to the unaffected primary motor cortex of chronic ischemic stroke patients in our study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In adults with stroke, TMS has been widely researched to assess or influence corticospinal excitability and reorganization [7,8,9,10]. In children with CP, NIBS can also be used for corticospinal excitability assessment [11,12,13,14,15,16,17], as well as a neuromodulatory intervention, to improve motor outcomes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%