Non-invasive brain stimulation associated mirror therapy for upper-limb rehabilitation after stroke: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials

Abstract

BackgroundNon-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) techniques and mirror therapy (MT) are promising rehabilitation measures for stroke. While the combination of MT and NIBS has been employed for post-stroke upper limb motor functional rehabilitation, its effectiveness has not been examined.ObjectiveThis study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of combined MT and NIBS in the recovery of upper limb motor function in stroke patients.MethodsThe search was carried out in PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Science Direct, CNKI, WANFANG and VIP until December 2021. Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing MT or NIBS alone with the combination of NIBS and MT in improving upper extremity motor recovery after stroke were selected. A meta-analysis was performed to calculate the mean differences (MD) or the standard mean differences (SMD) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) with random-effect models. Subgroup analyses were also conducted according to the types of control group, the types of NIBS, stimulation timing and phase poststroke.ResultsA total of 12 articles, including 17 studies with 628 patients, were reviewed in the meta-analysis. In comparison with MT or NIBS alone, the combined group significantly improved body structure and function (MD = 5.97; 95% CI: 5.01–6.93; P < 0.05), activity levels (SMD = 0.82; 95% CI 0.61–1.02; P < 0.05). For cortical excitability, the motor evoked potential cortical latency (SMD = −1.05; 95% CI:−1.57–−0.52; P < 0.05) and the central motor conduction time (SMD=-1.31 95% CI:−2.02-−0.61; P < 0.05) of the combined group were significantly shortened. A non-significant homogeneous summary effect size was found for MEP amplitude (SMD = 0.47; 95%CI = −0.29 to 1.23; P = 0.23). Subgroup analysis showed that there is an interaction between the stimulation sequence and the combined treatment effect.ConclusionIn this meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials, in comparison to the control groups, MT combined with NIBS promoted the recovery of upper extremity motor function after stroke, which was reflected in the analysis of body structure and function, activity levels, and cortical excitability.Systematic review registrationhttps://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42022304455.

Stroke Recovery Is a Journey: Prediction and Potentials of Motor Recovery after a Stroke from a Practical Perspective

“…Although it is known that medication alone (botulinum toxin therapy) [80] or electrical stimulation alone ( [81,82] is not effective in improving the motor function of the hand in chronic stroke survivors, results from this study [79] demonstrated that different interventions could work synergistically to achieve optimal clinical results. This concept of combining interventions to better recovery after a stroke is supported by results from other studies, such as medication and tDCS [83], tDCS and robot-assisted training [84], mirror therapy and electrical stimulation [85], mirror therapy and non-invasive brain stimulation [86], Vagus nerve stimulation and intense therapies [87].…”

Effectiveness of Syrebo’s Glove Rehabilitation Program in a Patient With Middle Cerebral Artery Infarct: A Case Report

“…Following Syrebo's glove rehabilitation program, patients demonstrated enhanced performance in various daily tasks such as dressing, feeding, and grooming. The program's focus on task-specific training facilitated the transfer of motor skills into functional abilities, empowering patients to engage more actively in their daily routines [ 19 ]. The sustainability of rehabilitation outcomes is a critical consideration in stroke management.…”