2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.specom.2018.06.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-intrusive codebook-based intelligibility prediction

Abstract: In recent years, there has been an increasing interest in objective measures of speech intelligibility in the speech processing community. Important progress has been made in intrusive measures of intelligibility, where the Short-Time Objective Intelligibility (STOI) method has become the de facto standard. Online adaptation of signal processing in, for example, hearing aids, in accordance with the listening conditions, requires a non-intrusive measure of intelligibility. Presently, however, no good non-intrus… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
(86 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the automatic classification of acoustic environments in which speech enhancement would benefit a HA user is vital [4,5]. In principle, this could be achieved by an objective speech intelligibility prediction metric running online in HAs [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, the automatic classification of acoustic environments in which speech enhancement would benefit a HA user is vital [4,5]. In principle, this could be achieved by an objective speech intelligibility prediction metric running online in HAs [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The aforementioned objective models are intrusivethey require a reference signal to determine predictions of speech intelligibility, which is not available in real-world scenarios. On the contrary, non-intrusive speech intelligibility models (ModA [14], SRMR [15], NIC-STOI [6]) require only a degraded speech signal for speech intelligibility prediction. This advantage makes non-intrusive models more suitable for real-world applications [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among these measures the articulation index [3], the speech transmission index (STI) [4], the speech intelligibility index (SII) [5], the short-time objective intelligibility (STOI) [6] and mutual-information-based techniques, such as the algorithm proposed in [7], are intrusive. Non-intrusive measures include a non-intrusive extension of the STOI [8], [9], that relies on estimating the amplitude envelope of the clean speech from the input signal, and measures relying on machine learning techniques. Some measures use a trained speech recognizer as proposed in [10], [11] or a neural network trained to predict SI from a sequence of spectral features [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%