2021
DOI: 10.1007/s00023-021-01107-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-integrable Ising Models in Cylindrical Geometry: Grassmann Representation and Infinite Volume Limit

Abstract: In this paper, meant as a companion to Antinucci et al. (Energy correlations of non-integrable Ising models: the scaling limit in the cylinder, 2020. arXiv: 1701.05356), we consider a class of non-integrable 2D Ising models in cylindrical domains, and we discuss two key aspects of the multiscale construction of their scaling limit. In particular, we provide a detailed derivation of the Grassmann representation of the model, including a self-contained presentation of the exact solution of the nearest neighbor m… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another common feature of the dimer and Ising models discussed in this paper is that their interacting, non-solvable, versions can be formulated exactly, at finite a and finite Ω, in terms of non-Gaussian Grassmann integrals [6,44,50]. For instance, the partition function of the interacting dimer model can be written as follows (again, the one of the non-planar Ising model admits an analogous representation):…”
Section: Methods and Ideas Behind The Proofsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Another common feature of the dimer and Ising models discussed in this paper is that their interacting, non-solvable, versions can be formulated exactly, at finite a and finite Ω, in terms of non-Gaussian Grassmann integrals [6,44,50]. For instance, the partition function of the interacting dimer model can be written as follows (again, the one of the non-planar Ising model admits an analogous representation):…”
Section: Methods and Ideas Behind The Proofsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The approach developed over the years to identify these cancellations in critical systems is based on the ideas of Wilsonian RG. More specifically, the constructive RG approach used in the proofs of Theorems 2.1 to 3.2 is the one developed by Benfatto, Gallavotti, Mastropietro and coworkers [16,17,19] and reviewed in, e.g., [43,75]; see also the more recent works [6], [48], and [47], which review and provide a pedagogical introduction to this method in the specific contexts of non-planar Ising models, interacting dimer models, and fermionic φ 4 d theories with long range interactions, respectively. At a very coarse level, the idea is to compute (4.2) recursively, first integrating out the degrees of freedom at length scales ℓ 0 2 −N ≃ a (here ℓ 0 is the length unit and −N = ⌊log 2 (a/ℓ 0 )⌋), then those at length scales ℓ 0 2 −N +1 , ℓ 0 2 −N +2 , .…”
Section: Methods and Ideas Behind The Proofsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…From a technical point of view, going in this direction requires a non-trivial extension of the RG multiscale methods to the non-translationally-invariant setting, and a sharp control of the RG flow of the marginal boundary running coupling constants. Promising results in this direction have been recently obtained in the context of non-planar critical Ising models in the half-plane [5].…”
Section: Theorem 2 [23]mentioning
confidence: 97%