2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.physd.2008.10.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-integrability of the Anisotropic Stormer Problem and the Isosceles Three-Body Problem

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(45 reference statements)
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, obvious close congruence of results of the approximated solution with respect to the solution of the full ODE system can be considered as the advances of the suggested approach. Meanwhile, it should be highlighted that quasi‐periodic character of the obtained solutions is in agreement with the other results available in literature (see works among [8, 17–40] which concern the problem under consideration, where [37–40] are within the framework of the analytical approach to the study of mathematical models); besides, we should note that the elegant partial semianalytical or numerical solutions have been obtained in [23–27] for the special cases of magnetic field (with zero electric field's components).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Thus, obvious close congruence of results of the approximated solution with respect to the solution of the full ODE system can be considered as the advances of the suggested approach. Meanwhile, it should be highlighted that quasi‐periodic character of the obtained solutions is in agreement with the other results available in literature (see works among [8, 17–40] which concern the problem under consideration, where [37–40] are within the framework of the analytical approach to the study of mathematical models); besides, we should note that the elegant partial semianalytical or numerical solutions have been obtained in [23–27] for the special cases of magnetic field (with zero electric field's components).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Bruns in [1] proved the non-existence of additional algebraic first integrals, later generalized by Julliard-Tosel [3], and more recent work like [4,5,6] prove the meromorphic non-integrability or non existence of meromorphic first integrals in some cases. All these proofs strongly suggest that the n-body problem is never integrable for n ≥ 3, even in particular cases (as proven for example for the isosceles 3-body problem in [7]). The colinear problem (in dimension 1) is a priori more difficult than the non-integrability proof of the n body problem in the plane and higher dimension, because it needs fewer additional first integrals to be integrable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Using integrability table of [17], we see that the condition on eigenvalues (7) implies that the table A for such eigenvalues will only have zeros. So noting X 1 , .…”
Section: Second Order Variational Equationsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Shibayama (2011) also showed the existence of planar periodic orbits with binary collisions for any period. See, e.g., Chiralt et al (2008), Cors et al (2009), Nomikos andPapageorgiou (2009) and Offin and Grand'maison (2005) for other recent results on the isosceles three-body problem.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%