Biological Invaders in Inland Waters: Profiles, Distribution, and Threats
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4020-6029-8_5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-indigenous freshwater molluscs and their distribution in Italy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
32
0

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
2
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Though the hypothesis remains untested, such features may thus compensate for P. acuta's inherent poor competitive ability at least in food-rich (and hence often species-rich; e.g., Jokinen, 1987;Costil and Clement, 1996) gastropod communities, which typically feature abundant physid populations (e.g., Jokinen, 1987;Lombardo, 2005). The high degree of activity also may be behind the apparent replacement of the native Physa fontinalis L. 1758 by the North American P. acuta in much of western and Mediterranean Europe (Anderson, 2003;Cianfanelli et al, 2007;Garcı´a-Berthou et al, 2007); however, direct comparisons between these two physids are needed to support this hypothesis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Though the hypothesis remains untested, such features may thus compensate for P. acuta's inherent poor competitive ability at least in food-rich (and hence often species-rich; e.g., Jokinen, 1987;Costil and Clement, 1996) gastropod communities, which typically feature abundant physid populations (e.g., Jokinen, 1987;Lombardo, 2005). The high degree of activity also may be behind the apparent replacement of the native Physa fontinalis L. 1758 by the North American P. acuta in much of western and Mediterranean Europe (Anderson, 2003;Cianfanelli et al, 2007;Garcı´a-Berthou et al, 2007); however, direct comparisons between these two physids are needed to support this hypothesis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, it is important to take into account that D. polymorpha is considered an invasive alien species all over Europe and the United States, even if this mollusk was present in Europe before the last glaciation [32] and was then bounded in some basins of Eastern Europe in the post-glacial period until the 18th century [33]. The human activity has then favored the distribution of D. polymorpha all over its original European areal; in Italy, for example, this bivalve has first been found in 1973 [34] and its presence in the Italian inland waters has been confirmed by subsequent studies [35][36][37]. Therefore, the idea of using this invasive species for anthropic purposes (bio-filtration, human food, animal feed, fertilizer and biogas) [29] [21] or potentially toxic metals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…It was first introduced to Europe via Romania in 1979 (Sàr-kàny-Kiss 1986) from where it quickly spread to several other European countries (Lajtner and Crnčan 2011). It was first reported in Italy in 1996 (Manganelli et al 1998) and since has rapidly colonized several Italian regions, including the south (Cianfanelli et al 2007;De Vico et al 2007). In Croatia, this species was recorded in 2001 in the river Danube, which forms the border between Croatia and Serbia (Paunović et al 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%