A rate-based membrane gas-solvent contactor model was programmed in Aspen Custom Modeler (ACM) and interfaced with the Aspen Plus software suite to enable flowsheet simulations of carbon capture processes. After validation with different sets of laboratory and pilot plant data, the model's rigorous approach was examined against the commercial RadFrac model of Aspen Plus used for conventional absorption−stripping column simulations. Under identical processing conditions, both models predicted similar results for the temperature, flow rate, and composition of the streams leaving the absorption and stripping units. Differences between the two models were most pronounced for liquid and gas temperature profiles, which were attributed to the different energy balance methods used in the two models, but the difference was not large enough (∼10 °C) to influence the mass transfer within the membrane contactor, as the composition and flow rate of leaving streams were almost identical to that of the RadFrac model. A process intensification factor analysis showed that membrane contactor technology could reduce the volume of equipment required by a magnitude of 44 to undertake the same carbon capture ratio as the conventional column process.