1981
DOI: 10.1016/0005-2787(81)90105-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-histone proteins in fractionated chromatin before and after DNAase II treatment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1982
1982
1989
1989

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other investigators have repeatedly shown that the immunological specificity of chromosomal proteins depends on the presence of proteins that bind tightly to DNA (34)(35)(36)(37). The 2 M NaCl resistant chromatin fraction has been shown to be more sensitive to digestion with DNase II than native chromatin and to be more enriched in active chromatin (38). Perle et al (39) reported that some developmentally regulated nonhistone proteins were found to be both tightly bound to DNA and localized near DNase sensitive domains of precartilage cell chromatin.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other investigators have repeatedly shown that the immunological specificity of chromosomal proteins depends on the presence of proteins that bind tightly to DNA (34)(35)(36)(37). The 2 M NaCl resistant chromatin fraction has been shown to be more sensitive to digestion with DNase II than native chromatin and to be more enriched in active chromatin (38). Perle et al (39) reported that some developmentally regulated nonhistone proteins were found to be both tightly bound to DNA and localized near DNase sensitive domains of precartilage cell chromatin.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chromatin was pelleted at the bottom of the tube, nucleoplasm (residual fraction after extraction with 0.14 M NaCl) was recovered from the top, and nuclear membranes were taken at the interface. Chromatin was further fractionated by extraction with 0.35 M and 2 M NaCl as described (25 Solid-Phase Radioimmunoassay. Chromatin was resuspended in 1 mM Tris Cl/1 mM EDTA at pH 7.4 and adsorbed to the wells of polyvinyl chloride microwell plates at 4°C, as described (27), but without chromatin sonication.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chromatin was isolated as described by Rakowicz-Szulczynska et al (1981). Briefly, the purified nuclei were washed with 10 mM Tris/HCl, pH 8.3, 140 mM NaCl.…”
Section: Cell Fractionation Of Mammary Gland Tissuementioning
confidence: 99%