Non-Gaussian properties of second-order wave orbital velocity

Abstract

A stochastic second-order wave model is applied to assess the statistical properties of wave orbital velocity in random sea states below the water surface. Directional spreading effects as well as the dependency of the water depth are investigated by means of a Monte-Carlo approach. Unlike for the surface elevation, sub-harmonics dominate the second-order contribution to orbital velocity. We show that a notable set-down occurs for the most energetic and steepest groups. This engenders a negative skewness in the temporal evolution of the orbital velocity. A substantial deviation of the upper and lower tails of the probability density function from the Gaussian distribution is noticed, velocities are faster below the wave trough and slower below the wave crest when compared with linear theory predictions. Second-order nonlinearity effects strengthen with reducing the water depth, while weaken with the broadening of the wave spectrum. The results are confirmed by laboratory data. Corresponding experiments have been conducted in a large wave basin taking into account the directionality of the wave field. As shown, laboratory data are in very good agreement with the numerical prediction.Comment: 13 pages, 8 figure

On the statistical properties of surface elevation, velocities and accelerations in multi-directional irregular water waves

“…Numerical simulations have been carried out by Toffoli et al (2012), who showed that the PDF of the fluid velocity at the surface antiparallel to the surface deviates from that of a normal distribution only for long-crested seas in which modulational instabilities may occur. Other numerical studies have been performed by Sergeeva & Slunyaev (2013), who investigated whether large fluid velocities at the surface only occur in connection with large surface elevations, and Alberello et al (2016), who demonstrated that second-order effects lead to a negative skewness of the PDF of the fluid velocity below the surface. Finally, it has been found from experiments with extreme breaking waves that the velocity and acceleration fields exhibit a substantial degree of front/back asymmetry (Grue & Jensen 2006) and that the results of common techniques for the estimation of the velocity profile from measurements of the surface elevation may deviate substantially from the actual velocity profiles for certain extreme waves (Alberello et al 2018).…”

An experimental comparison of velocities underneath focussed breaking waves

“…The mechanisms leading to the formation of such extreme waves have been investigated and probabilistic descriptions derived to provide improved design criteria (e.g. [1,2,3,4]). Breaking of large waves is the most hazardous condition in terms of wave forces on marine structures [5,6,7].…”

A Sensitivity Analysis of the Wind Forcing Effect on the Accuracy of Large-Wave Hindcasting

“…On another note, only significant wave height was selected as a representative wave parameter to evaluate the wind forcing effect on large wave prediction. Although wave height is critical to assess the force and potential damage of large waves on WECs, other parameters, such as the wave period, should be considered to calculate the hydrodynamic force on WECs during extreme weather conditions (e.g., storms) [20,21]. Therefore, future work should include more systematic comparison of additional wave parameters.…”