2006
DOI: 10.1063/1.2196879
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-Gaussian energy landscape of a simple model for strong network-forming liquids: Accurate evaluation of the configurational entropy

Abstract: We present a numerical study of the statistical properties of the potential energy landscape of a simple model for strong network-forming liquids. The model is a system of spherical particles interacting through a square well potential, with an additional constraint that limits the maximum number of bonds, Nmax, per particle. Extensive simulations have been carried out as a function of temperature, packing fraction, and Nmax. The dynamics of this model are characterized by Arrhenius temperature dependence of t… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
28
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 84 publications
(128 reference statements)
3
28
1
Order By: Relevance
“…8. First, for the large θ , noncrystallizing model, panels (a) and (b) report the iso-diffusivity line for the smallest value of the diffusion coefficient which it was possible to estimate in lengthy simulations (the computer analog of the glass line 35,38 ). Indeed, the nucleation rate, besides depending on β μ, is also affected by particle mobility and hence there is the possibility that crystallization is further suppressed for kinetic reasons.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8. First, for the large θ , noncrystallizing model, panels (a) and (b) report the iso-diffusivity line for the smallest value of the diffusion coefficient which it was possible to estimate in lengthy simulations (the computer analog of the glass line 35,38 ). Indeed, the nucleation rate, besides depending on β μ, is also affected by particle mobility and hence there is the possibility that crystallization is further suppressed for kinetic reasons.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…16 Of course, the data in Fig. 2 do not rule out the existence, at some yet inaccessible temperature, of a crossover in the behavior of S conf that makes it smoothly vanish at T = 0, 46,47 or remain finite with an equilibrium residual entropy in classical systems, [48][49][50][51][52] or a discontinuous jump due to an unavoidable crystallization, 29,53,54 or a liquid-liquid transition, 22 or a conventional (kinetic) glass transition. 55 These alternative pos-sibilities are not supported by data any better than the entropy crisis they try to avoid.…”
Section: B Why the Configurational Entropy?mentioning
confidence: 92%
“…3(d). These considerations suggest that further analysis of the potential enery landscape properties of the present system and comparison with model landscapes [26,27] could be very valuable.…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%