2012 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation 2012
DOI: 10.1109/icra.2012.6225223
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-Gaussian belief space planning: Correctness and complexity

Abstract: Abstract-We consider the partially observable control problem where it is potentially necessary to perform complex information-gathering operations in order to localize state. One approach to solving these problems is to create plans in belief-space, the space of probability distributions over the underlying state of the system. The belief-space plan encodes a strategy for performing a task while gaining information as necessary. Unlike most approaches in the literature which rely upon representing belief stat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
(12 reference statements)
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this section, we test the proposed approach on a popular problem known as "light-dark domain" [16] which has been previously solved using techniques like belief-space planner [16] and convex optimization [17]. In this problem, a robot with noisy dynamics has to localize its position before entering a pre-defined goal region to obtain reward.…”
Section: B Light-dark Domainmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this section, we test the proposed approach on a popular problem known as "light-dark domain" [16] which has been previously solved using techniques like belief-space planner [16] and convex optimization [17]. In this problem, a robot with noisy dynamics has to localize its position before entering a pre-defined goal region to obtain reward.…”
Section: B Light-dark Domainmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are regions in the state-space with beacons, i.e., light regions where highly accurate observations can be obtained while all other parts of the state-space are dark regions with large observation noise. Let the system be, Note that our formulation is non-convex and is a harder problem than a quadratic gradient in G(x) considered in [16], [17]. A gradient ensures that even greedy policies can solve the problem whereas in our case, SARSOP is not aware of any good policy until it explicitly samples the light region.…”
Section: B Light-dark Domainmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our work instead builds on the approach of Platt et al [13], [14]. That work plans a sequence of actions that will generate observations that distinguish a hypothesised state from competing hypotheses while also reaching a goal position.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to [13], our approach encodes information gathering actions to localise an object to be grasped in 6 dimensions while simultaneously attempts to achieve the task. Similarly to [13], [14], our method is guaranteed to converge to the true state of the system in which a reach-to-grasp trajectory suceeds with high probability. Here we also show how this approach can be extended to planning the motion of a manipulator performing multi-finger grasping.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, other approaches for belief space planning [24] [84] for an exception to this) for computational efficiency and hence the true belief state is not tracked.…”
Section: Planning Under Uncertaintymentioning
confidence: 99%