2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133273
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-farm employment promotes nutritious diet without increasing carbon footprint: Evidence from rural China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Non-farm employment. Referring to previous research [ 20 , 55 ], this variable is measured by the number of family members with non-farm employment.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Non-farm employment. Referring to previous research [ 20 , 55 ], this variable is measured by the number of family members with non-farm employment.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies have examined the impact of non-farm employment on the food consumption and nutritional intake of rural households from different perspectives. Ma (2022) focused on the carbon footprint perspective to analyze the impact of non-farm employment on the total amount and structure of household food consumption and obtained the conclusion that non-farm employment is positively associated with household food consumption [ 20 ]. Bai (2024) analyzed the impact of non-farm employment and agricultural production activities on improving household dietary diversity in Asia and empirically confirmed that non-farm employment is positively associated with household dietary diversity [ 21 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Emp represents the number of migrant and local off-farm workers in every family, respectively. It is measured by the number of migrants or local off-farm workers in every family (Taylor et al, 2003;Atamanov and Van den Berg, 2012;Ma et al, 2022). Migrants refer to the members who move to urban areas and engage in non-agricultural undertakings for more than 6 months a year and do not go back their rural homes regularly (less than 2 times a year), whereas local off-farm employees denote the ones who remain in their rural homes and participate in off-farm work for over a half of a year.…”
Section: Empirical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, those who stay in the countryside can use the remittances of the migrant workers to their families to invest in agricultural production operations, buy agricultural machinery or fertilizers to increase productivity [32], and perform the substitution role of the capital factor for the labor factor [33], thus reshaping the input-output relationship in food production. The micro-household perspective has also been taken into consideration, suggesting that nonagricultural employment is an essential way to provide improved food consumption for smallholder households [34], which can contribute to household nutrition [35] and play an important role in the reduction of malnutrition and the conservation of agro-biodiversity [36].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%