The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.nuclphysbps.2005.01.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-factorizable contributions to Bd0¯Ds(*)D

Abstract: It is pointed out that decays of the type B → DD have no factorizable contributions, unless at least one of the charmed mesons in the final state is a vector meson. The dominant contributions to the decay amplitudes arise from chiral loop contributions and tree level amplitudes generated by soft gluon emissions forming a gluon condensate. We predict that the branching ratios for the processesB 0 → s are all of order (3 − 4) × 10 −4 , whileB 0 → D + * s D − * s has a branching ratio 5 to 10 times bigger. We emp… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
13
1
Order By: Relevance
“…[34] (albeit the real part of the ratio has the opposite sign), but smaller than the result in Ref. [50]. On the other hand the measured values for the branching ratios of the annihilation-dominated modes seem consistently larger than the estimates in Ref.…”
Section: E Branching Ratios and Su(3) Breakingcontrasting
confidence: 67%
“…[34] (albeit the real part of the ratio has the opposite sign), but smaller than the result in Ref. [50]. On the other hand the measured values for the branching ratios of the annihilation-dominated modes seem consistently larger than the estimates in Ref.…”
Section: E Branching Ratios and Su(3) Breakingcontrasting
confidence: 67%
“…Using B(B 0 → D − s π + ) from [2] we obtain This value represents the first existing limit on this decay mode and reaches the sensitivity to test the prediction of [3].…”
Section: Pos(hep2005)200mentioning
confidence: 83%
“…These counterterms are not considered here (or in [3,4]) and has to be be considered together with the constant (non-logarithmic) chiral loop terms which we also have dropped in this analysis. The inclusion of counterterms and constant chiral loops terms will be discussed elsewhere.…”
Section: Heavy Light Chiral Perturbation Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our approach [3,4], the non-factorizable contributions are coming from chiral loops and from tree level amplitudes generated by soft gluon emision forming a gluon condensate. The gluon condensate contributions can be calculated within a recently developed Heavy Light Chiral Quark Model (HLχQM) [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%