2013
DOI: 10.1007/jhep01(2013)083
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-extremal geometries and holographic phase transitions

Abstract: Using the low energy limit of type IIB superstring theory, we obtain the nonextremal limit of deformed conifold geometry which is dual to the IR limit of large N thermal QCD. At low temperatures, the extremal geometry without black hole is favored while at high temperatures, the field theory is described by non-extremal black hole geometry. We compute the ten dimensional on shell action for extremal and non-extremal geometries and demonstrate that at a critical temperature T c there is a first order confinemen… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

3
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 103 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the gauge theory side, the configuration is given in figure 1. The details of this configuration has already appeared in our earlier papers [20] so we will be brief. It is easy to see that at high energy, i.e the energy bigger than the excitation energy of the D5 anti-D5 strings, the theory will be governed by an SU (N + M ǫ ) × SU (N + M ) gauge theory where the factor M ǫ appears from the M D5 anti-D5 pairs (there are no tachyons, so only the D5 charges cancel giving rise to M fractional D3-branes) as:…”
Section: A Brief Detour Into the Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On the gauge theory side, the configuration is given in figure 1. The details of this configuration has already appeared in our earlier papers [20] so we will be brief. It is easy to see that at high energy, i.e the energy bigger than the excitation energy of the D5 anti-D5 strings, the theory will be governed by an SU (N + M ǫ ) × SU (N + M ) gauge theory where the factor M ǫ appears from the M D5 anti-D5 pairs (there are no tachyons, so only the D5 charges cancel giving rise to M fractional D3-branes) as:…”
Section: A Brief Detour Into the Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Once the dual background is constructed, it is not too hard to write the full supergravity solution. This has been worked out in details in [5,13,20]. 6 The world-volume fluxes on the branes and the anti-branes effectively create bound D3-branes respectively on the branes and the anti-branes.…”
Section: Background Supergravity Solutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Going to the ω → 0 limit, (4.80) does lead to an unambiguous value for the bulk viscosity as we show in (4.84) and (4.87) by taking the ratio of the bulk viscosity with the entropy density. Our result is expressed in terms of certain functions f 0 (r) or f 0 (r) which are related by (19). These functions entail the details of the UV completion of the model and are therefore technically challenging to derive.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…b (i)n ω 2n+1 X 0 (r, |ω|) + X 11 (r, |ω|) + O( 2 ), (4.86) 19 Recall our definition of T c in [13]: T c = g (r h ) 4π √ h(r h )g(rc)…”
Section: Towards Bulk Viscosity In the Non-conformal Limitmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation