2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.compfluid.2021.105019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-explicit large eddy simulations of turbulent channel flows from Reτ=180 up to Reτ=

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The underestimation of the reattachment length of the primary separation bubble in laminar BFS can be attributed to the lower effectiveness of this model in laminar regions compared to transitional and turbulent regimes. This approach has the potential to be improved by recent developments in the iLES approach like spatially-varying artificial viscosity [32] and hyperviscous filtering [33].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The underestimation of the reattachment length of the primary separation bubble in laminar BFS can be attributed to the lower effectiveness of this model in laminar regions compared to transitional and turbulent regimes. This approach has the potential to be improved by recent developments in the iLES approach like spatially-varying artificial viscosity [32] and hyperviscous filtering [33].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For brevity, further details are not provided here. However, the reader is referred to Dairay et al (2017), Deskos et al (2019), Frantz et al (2021), Mahfoze and Laizet (2021) for more information about the present ILES strategy.…”
Section: Flow Solvermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The degree of numerical dissipation is controlled by a single parameter ( 0 ∕ ), which corresponds to the added dissipation at the cutoff wavenumber, and the range of scales over which the numerical dissipation is added is controlled by the parameter c 1 (see Dairay et al (2017) for more details). The present work follows the recommendation of Mahfoze and Laizet (2021), who determined suitable ranges for these parameters for wall-bounded turbulent flows. Therefore, for this work 0 ∕ = 20 and c 1 = 0.1755 (low Reynolds numbers) -0.351 (high Reynolds numbers).…”
Section: Flow Solvermentioning
confidence: 99%