Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2014 American Control Conference 2014
DOI: 10.1109/acc.2014.6858689
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-existence conditions of local bifurcations for rational systems with structured uncertainties

Abstract: Sufficient conditions are presented for the avoidance of bifurcations for uncertain rational systems. A necessary condition for a steady-state bifurcation to occur is that the system's Jacobian has a zero eigenvalue, and a necessary condition for a Hopf bifurcation to occur is that the system's Jacobian has a pair of pure imaginary eigenvalues. Based on the structured singular value µ and skewed structured singular value ν, this paper derives guaranteed non-existence conditions for a zero eigenvalue and pure i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…See [3] for the construction of an LFT for this example. Example 3 Possible parameter values for p 1 , p 2 , and p 3 (a higher‐dimensional case) A predator‐prey model is given by [34, 35] right left1em4ptx˙1=x1(1x1) p1x1x2p3+x1,x˙2=p2x2+ p1x1x2p3+x1,where x 1 and x 2 are scaled population numbers, and p 1 , p 2 , p 3 are parameters that characterise the behaviour of the system. For this system to avoid bifurcations, the parameters must satisfy two conditions: one to avoid a steady‐state bifurcation and one to avoid a Hopf bifurcation; these conditions can be simplified to two scalar conditions [36]. …”
Section: Numerical Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…See [3] for the construction of an LFT for this example. Example 3 Possible parameter values for p 1 , p 2 , and p 3 (a higher‐dimensional case) A predator‐prey model is given by [34, 35] right left1em4ptx˙1=x1(1x1) p1x1x2p3+x1,x˙2=p2x2+ p1x1x2p3+x1,where x 1 and x 2 are scaled population numbers, and p 1 , p 2 , p 3 are parameters that characterise the behaviour of the system. For this system to avoid bifurcations, the parameters must satisfy two conditions: one to avoid a steady‐state bifurcation and one to avoid a Hopf bifurcation; these conditions can be simplified to two scalar conditions [36]. …”
Section: Numerical Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The class of positive matrices like level symmetric matrices and Hermitian positive definite matrices are widely used in mathematics and in various applications of engineering. For instance, computer vision (Nemirovskii, 1993), the mechine learning (Kishida and Braatz, 2014) and in the area of convex optimization (Braatz et al, 1994). The Linear Matrix Inequality (LMI) technique based on the positive definiteness nature of matrix is widely used to study the stability analysis of feedback systems in linear control.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%