2020
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2010.03553
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-Equilibrium Steady State of the Lieb-Liniger model: multiple-integral representation of the time evolved many-body wave-function

Abstract: We continue our study of the emergence of Non-Equilibrium Steady States in quantum integrable models focusing on the expansion of a Lieb-Liniger gas for arbitrary repulsive interaction. As a first step towards the derivation of the asymptotics of observables in the thermodynamic and large distance and time limit, we derive an exact multiple integral representation of the time evolved manybody wave-function. Starting from the known but complicated expression for the overlaps of the initial state of a geometric … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(69 reference statements)
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This agrees with the scattering phase found earlier in (15). For the limit of the S-matrix factor between 1-strings and n-strings for n > 1 we find:…”
Section: A Bethe Ansatz For the Xxz Chainsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This agrees with the scattering phase found earlier in (15). For the limit of the S-matrix factor between 1-strings and n-strings for n > 1 we find:…”
Section: A Bethe Ansatz For the Xxz Chainsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Some elements of the theory can be considered proven, for example key statements about the mean values of current operators (see the review [12]), but it would be desirable to rigorously prove more aspects of the theory. It was shown in the remarkable work [13] that certain statements of GGE and GHD can be checked in the Lieb-Liniger model in a large coupling expansion; up to date this result is one of the most convincing analytic checks of GGE and GHD (for closely related works see [10,11,[14][15][16]). Nevertheless there remains a need for simple toy models, which have genuine interactions in them, and which can lead to exact proofs of the GHD predictions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…[96] in the context of a strong coupling expansion. Instead, only partial results [97,98] are currently available for inhomogeneous quench problems.…”
Section: Comparison With Ghdmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While some parts of GHD can be put on firm grounds (see e.g. [27][28][29]), this is known to be a very difficult [30] if not hopeless task. Less ambitiously, one could ask for one example of an interacting quench for which exact lattice calculations may be compared to GHD predictions, but no such example is known.…”
Section: Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%