2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jas.2011.11.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-destructive pXRF of mafic stone tools

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
29
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
2
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The EAF is currently working on generating an improved calibration for mafic rocks using multiple pelletized USGS rock standards that better bracket concentrations for basalts. However, our results are internally consistent, and the patterns noted in our samples hold whether considering calibrated results or Comptonnormalized peak heights (e.g., Grave et al, 2012).…”
Section: X-ray Fluorescence Analysissupporting
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The EAF is currently working on generating an improved calibration for mafic rocks using multiple pelletized USGS rock standards that better bracket concentrations for basalts. However, our results are internally consistent, and the patterns noted in our samples hold whether considering calibrated results or Comptonnormalized peak heights (e.g., Grave et al, 2012).…”
Section: X-ray Fluorescence Analysissupporting
confidence: 80%
“…In other areas of the world, XRF analyses of basalts have generated enlightening results (e.g. Grave et al, 2012;Lundblad et al, 2008;Mills et al, 2011) and suggest that similar projects elsewhere might enjoy comparable success.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A major advantage of pXRF is that instruments can be transported to study objects in situ, thereby permitting multi-element analyses of archaeological materials in non-traditional laboratory environments. However, archaeological applications of pXRF are still today an object of discussion (Liritzis, & Zacharias, 2010;Tykot, et al, 2013), principally because of a perceived lack of analytic rigour (Shackley, 2010(Shackley, , 2012Grave, Attenbrow, Sutherland, Pogson & Forster, 2012;Speakman & Shackley, 2013;Frahm & Doonan, 2013). The present work contributes to this debate regarding pXRF through the study of Caltagirone pottery raw materials.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…While such criticisms are valid and should be considered carefully when designing PXRF-based studies, it should also be noted that different research questions and materials may require different analytical approaches and different units of measurement (e.g., Grave et al, 2012Grave et al, : 1676. Quantitative values are critical in some applications, such as obsidian provenance analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%