2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2017.01.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-destructive prediction of soluble solids and dry matter content using NIR spectroscopy and its relationship with sensory quality in sweet cherries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

6
41
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
6
41
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In fruit that does not accumulate fat, the DM is usually 15% to 30% of the fresh weight (Escribano et al, 2017). In the present study, the DM content of the flesh of the sour cherry genotypes was also high when compared to that of sweet cherry (Alrgei et al, 2014;Escribano et al, 2017;Grafe et al, 2009). On average (i.e., the mean values of the genotypes studied), the main contributors to DM were glucose (23.1%), fructose (20.3%), sorbitol (13.6%), and malic acid (18.8%).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 50%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In fruit that does not accumulate fat, the DM is usually 15% to 30% of the fresh weight (Escribano et al, 2017). In the present study, the DM content of the flesh of the sour cherry genotypes was also high when compared to that of sweet cherry (Alrgei et al, 2014;Escribano et al, 2017;Grafe et al, 2009). On average (i.e., the mean values of the genotypes studied), the main contributors to DM were glucose (23.1%), fructose (20.3%), sorbitol (13.6%), and malic acid (18.8%).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 50%
“…Various types of components can contribute to the DM of fruit (Grafe et al, 2009). In fruit that does not accumulate fat, the DM is usually 15% to 30% of the fresh weight (Escribano et al, 2017). In the present study, the DM content of the flesh of the sour cherry genotypes was also high when compared to that of sweet cherry (Alrgei et al, 2014;Escribano et al, 2017;Grafe et al, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 50%
“…To date, Vis-NIR spectroscopy and related approach have been successfully applied to develop theoretical models for the discrimination of shelf-life or storage stages of freshcut salads and apples (Beghi, Giovenzana, Civelli, & Guidetti, 2016), peaches (Huang, Meng, Zhu, & Wu, 2017), pears (He, Fu, Rao, & Fang, 2016), and Valerianella locusta L. (Giovenzana, Beghi, Buratti, Civelli, & Guidetti, 2014). Post-harvest quality, such as SSC (soluble solids content), dry matter, pH, and firmness, was also investigated in tomatoes (Huang, Lu, & Chen, 2018), oranges (Ncama, Opara, Tesfay, Fawole, & Magwaza, 2017), sweet cherries (Escribano, Biasi, Lerud, Slaughter, & Mitcham, 2017), plums (Li, Pullanagari, Pranamornkith, Yule, & East, 2017), pears (Wang, Wang, Chen, & Han, 2017), and kiwifruits (Li et al, 2017) by Vis/NIR spectroscopy. In strawberries, a limited literature on the use of Vis/NIR related techniques for quality estimation has been found.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These are the properties that determine the selection of the appropriate harvest time, which is usually defined with the use of destructive methods for fruits. These methods are time-consuming and usually employed under laboratory conditions (Pappas et al, 2011;Escribano et al, 2017;Li et al, 2018). However, the storage industry is looking for solutions, which will allow it to assess the quality of fruits in a quick, economical and non-destructive method, preferably during the sorting process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%