Non‐Destructive or Noninvasive? The Potential Effect of X‐Ray Fluorescence Spectrometers on Luminescence Age Estimates of Archaeological Samples

Abstract

The non-destructive nature of X-ray fluorescence (XRF) spectrometers is a principal reason for an increase in their use in archaeological science over the last 15 years, especially for analyzing museum-curated artifacts and in situ site fabrics. Here, we show that low-power XRF spectrometry can be detrimental for luminescence dating (surface applications such as mud-wasp nest dating in particular). We investigated the effects of irradiation by X-rays emitted from handheld and benchtop spectrometers on optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) signals. Measurements were taken using a portable OSL (pOSL) unit on the following unprepared archaeological materials: sedimentary quartz grains, pottery, a mud-wasp nest, stone tools, and a rock flake with anthropogenically applied pigment and natural pigmentation (iron oxides). We observed an increase in luminescence compared to initial background counts for all materials tested, which could lead to overestimation of age determinations in some situations. Our experiment provides a reminder of the potential effects of Xray radiation, and the need for thorough documentation of all recording and analytical techniques applied to archaeological materials. C 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Archeometrical Characterization of Rock Art Pigments from Puerto Roque Open-Air Rock Art Shelter (Valencia De Alcantara, Extremadura, Spain)

“…Ethical removal techniques, adhering to the code of ethics and guidelines established by the American Institute for Conservation [33], were employed to ensure the preservation of the artwork [34,35]. Each sample, weighing between 10 and 100 mg, was extracted from areas where pigment was readily observable using a sterilised tungsten scalpel and placed in 0.5 mL microcentrifuge tubes [36].…”

Archeometrical Characterization of Rock-Art Pigments from Puerto Roque Open-Air Rock Art Shelter (Valencia De Alcantara, Extremadura, Spain)

“…Ethical non-contact removal techniques, adhering to the code of ethics and guidelines established by the American Institute for Conservation [33], were employed to ensure the preservation of the artwork [34,35]. Each sample, weighing between 10 and 100 mg, was extracted from areas where pigment was readily observable using a sterilised tungsten scalpel and placed in 0.5 ml microcentrifuge tubes [36].…”