Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.ndteint.2014.01.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-destructive evaluation of cracks in massive concrete using normal dc resistivity logging

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, proposed model in Chouteau and Beaulieu [77] only identified the effect on resistivity measurements as being different when cracking was present. In addition, to evaluate and detect cracks and discontinuities, such as joints, in massive concrete structures within preexisting boreholes, electrical resistivity measurements with a DC current was stated to be a good quality assessment indicator [78]; however, using a DC current rather than AC current may result in unfavorable results due to polarization effect which was not considered in Taillet et al [78].…”
Section: Presence Of Cracks In the Concretementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, proposed model in Chouteau and Beaulieu [77] only identified the effect on resistivity measurements as being different when cracking was present. In addition, to evaluate and detect cracks and discontinuities, such as joints, in massive concrete structures within preexisting boreholes, electrical resistivity measurements with a DC current was stated to be a good quality assessment indicator [78]; however, using a DC current rather than AC current may result in unfavorable results due to polarization effect which was not considered in Taillet et al [78].…”
Section: Presence Of Cracks In the Concretementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since its original use by Shimizu in the 1920's (Shimizu, 1928), many researchers have sought to use electrical measurements to describe hydration (Curran & McCarter, 1984;Osterminski, Polder, & Schießl, 2012;Sohn & Mason, 1998;Van Beek & Hilhorst, 1999;Wei & Xiao, 2014), transport properties (Ramezanianpour, Pilvar, Mahdikhani, & Moodi, 2011;Tang, Nilsson, & Basheer, 2011), or cracking (Chung, 2003;Niemuth, 2004;Peled, Torrents, Mason, Shah, & Garboczi, 2001;Pour-Ghaz, Niemuth, & Weiss, 2013;Taillet, Lataste, Rivard, & Denis, 2014;Wiwattanachang & Giao, 2011). Electrical testing has many advantages due to the low cost of testing equipment and short time duration that is needed to perform the test.…”
Section: Use Of Electrical Resistivity To Assess Freeze-thaw Damagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rapid chloride permeability test, which is based on electrical conductivity, is widely applied in the estimation of the durability of CBMs (Aashto, 2015;ASTM, 2010;Xiao et al, 2016). Electrical properties are also frequently considered as effective ways of studying the early-age properties of CBMs (Dong et al, 2016;Xiao and Li, 2008) and detecting cracks in CBMs (Lataste et al, 2003;Taillet et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%