2015
DOI: 10.3390/s150819069
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-Destructive Evaluation for Corrosion Monitoring in Concrete: A Review and Capability of Acoustic Emission Technique

Abstract: Corrosion of reinforced concrete (RC) structures has been one of the major causes of structural failure. Early detection of the corrosion process could help limit the location and the extent of necessary repairs or replacement, as well as reduce the cost associated with rehabilitation work. Non-destructive testing (NDT) methods have been found to be useful for in-situ evaluation of steel corrosion in RC, where the effect of steel corrosion and the integrity of the concrete structure can be assessed effectively… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
108
0
4

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 198 publications
(112 citation statements)
references
References 147 publications
(192 reference statements)
0
108
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The available standard NDT techniques used for corrosion monitoring include half-cell potential (HCP) and linear polarization resistance (LPR) methods [12][13]. The HCP technique enables the identification of the probability of corrosion activity of exposed reinforcing steel bars in RC structures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The available standard NDT techniques used for corrosion monitoring include half-cell potential (HCP) and linear polarization resistance (LPR) methods [12][13]. The HCP technique enables the identification of the probability of corrosion activity of exposed reinforcing steel bars in RC structures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, the LPR method is utilized to monitor the rate of corrosion in RC structures. Nonetheless, this method is based on assuming uniform corrosion of the reinforcing steel, which may contradict with the actual corrosion process in existing structures [13]. It should also be mentioned that, the previously mentioned NDT methods are both not suitable for real-time monitoring and are typically intrusive [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Measurement of AE signals during production processes or during loading of different structures usually generates a high number of detected signals. These signals can be associated to a patterns (vectors) composed of multiple relevant descriptors [13] to [16] with the intention to discriminate different damage mechanisms described with clusters. The patterns (vectors) can be classified into clusters according to their similarity by the use of multivariable data analyses based on pattern recognition algorithms [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Roughly 40% of the engineering structure damages result from the steel corrosion [1]. Many techniques have been developed to detect and evaluate the steel failures [2], such as electrochemical method [3,4], linear ultrasonic testing (UT) [5], acoustic emission (AE) [6][7][8], eddy current testing (ECT) [9][10][11], infrared thermography (IRT) [12][13][14], ground penetrating radar (GPR) [15], magnetic flux leakage (MFL) [16,17], electronic resistance testing (ERT) [18], fiber bragg grating (FBG) [19,20], and X-ray diffraction (XRD) [21]. However, in the field of identification of corrosion in the steel components in RC structure, nondestructive test (NDT) is the optimal selection, because the mechanical integrity of RC structure is always required after inspection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%