2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.jag.2006.11.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-destructive estimation of potato leaf chlorophyll from canopy hyperspectral reflectance using the inverted PROSAIL model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
38
1
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
6
38
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For potatoes, this approach performs well when the canopy is homogenous, but performed less well for an immature crop with a distinct row structure, or late in the growing season when the vines collapse (Botha et al 2007). For spring wheat, this approach was effective from the booting stage onward, but was not effective in early growth stages (Botha et al 2009). Leaf chlorophyll content estimates obtained from airborne hyperspectral data were considered very good for corn fields but moderate for wheat fields (Haboudane et al 2008).…”
Section: Plant-based Diagnostic Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For potatoes, this approach performs well when the canopy is homogenous, but performed less well for an immature crop with a distinct row structure, or late in the growing season when the vines collapse (Botha et al 2007). For spring wheat, this approach was effective from the booting stage onward, but was not effective in early growth stages (Botha et al 2009). Leaf chlorophyll content estimates obtained from airborne hyperspectral data were considered very good for corn fields but moderate for wheat fields (Haboudane et al 2008).…”
Section: Plant-based Diagnostic Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The forefront of imaging spectroscopy is the estimation of leaf chlorophyll content, leaf nitrogen content, leaf area index (LAI) and other variables by model inversion, including atmospheric and topographic corrections (Botha et al, 2007;Houborg et al, 2009;Jacquemoud et al, 2009;Kokaly et al, 2009;Vohland et al, 2010). Newer techniques for estimating leaf and canopy chlorophyll content use various methods to determine the geometric area bounded by a spectral reflectance curve (Oppelt and Mauser, 2004;Haboudane et al, 2008;Delegido et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…yellow -brown) of the senescent leaf m spectra was simulated using C ab = 50 μg cm -2 and N = 1. variations in the canopy fraction of senescent leaf mater reflectance spectra for a hypothetical canopy (LAI=4, C ab =50, C bp =3, s 1 =0.25, θ s =25, θ v =15, θ raz =140). The gray sections de the green, red and near-infrared band of the SPOT sensor (section in wavelengths longer than 1200 nm [23,55], and is set to fixed values of 50 and 150 g m -2 for cropland [56] and forest [57], respectively.…”
Section: Acrmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where L1 i , L2 i and L3 i are LAI values estimated as a function of ρ nir , NDVI and GNDVI, respectively using LUT relationships for each parameter combination (i) of N (1.0,1.2 .. 2.0), S z (0.5,0.6 .. 1.0), θ l (40,55,70), and C bp (2,3 .. 5). ΔLAI is only calculated for pixels with intermediate to high vegetation coverage, as determined by an NDVI threshold of 0.65 ( Fig.…”
Section: Land Cover Specific Parameter Retrievals (Step 4)mentioning
confidence: 99%