2019
DOI: 10.1080/10589759.2019.1662901
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-destructive determination of microstructural/mechanical properties and thickness variations in API X65 steel using magnetic hysteresis loop and artificial neural networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The sources of random errors include the stochastic process of domain motion, slight fluctuation in electrical parameters of instruments, the minor difference in the contact state between sensors and specimen surface, etc. Improving the prediction accuracy of intelligent models through structural optimization of neural networks has been extensively explored [ 15 , 16 ], but the robustness of the prediction model considering the repeatability of the multifunctional micromagnetic instrument was seldom investigated. If the robustness of the established prediction models is poor, large errors may occur in the quantitative prediction of mechanical properties using micromagnetic testing instruments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sources of random errors include the stochastic process of domain motion, slight fluctuation in electrical parameters of instruments, the minor difference in the contact state between sensors and specimen surface, etc. Improving the prediction accuracy of intelligent models through structural optimization of neural networks has been extensively explored [ 15 , 16 ], but the robustness of the prediction model considering the repeatability of the multifunctional micromagnetic instrument was seldom investigated. If the robustness of the established prediction models is poor, large errors may occur in the quantitative prediction of mechanical properties using micromagnetic testing instruments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with the MLR method, the neural network is more suitable for dealing with nonlinear modeling problems in quantitative evaluation of yield strength and tensile strength of steels. Sheng et al [17] and Mirzaee et al [18] employed the generalized regression neural network model and radialbasis function neural networks in model training and successfully realized nondestructive evaluation of mechanical properties of cold-rolled steel strips. We [17,[19][20][21] also proved that the micro-magnetic testing method combined with feedforward neural network (FF-NN) models outperformed the conventional ways in quantitatively predicting the surface hardness, case depth, and stress.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using a deep RNN, the spatial frequency-sequential relationships for motor imagery classification can even be explored (Luo et al, 2018). Furthermore, the microstructural/mechanical properties and thickness variations in API X65 steel can be determined in a non-destructive way with magnetic hysteresis loop and artificial neural networks (Mirzaee et al, 2020). However, there have been few attempts to intelligently monitor metal materials using Barkhausen noise signals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%