1993
DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-4754.1993.tb01020.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non‐destructive Analysis of Obsidian Artefacts Using Nuclear Techniques: Investigation of Provenance of Near Eastern Artefacts

Abstract: A non‐destructive analytical method using both instrumental neutron activation and proton‐induced gamma ray emission techniques was developed to study the provenance of obsidian artefacts from Turkey, Syria and Iraq.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
3

Year Published

1995
1995
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
16
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…For Qdeir 1, 25 artefacts were characterized by NAA (Gratuze et al, 1993), of which five were allocated to the analysts' group 1b (Bingöl A/Nemrut Dag), 11 to Bingöl B and nine to Kayırlı (Göllü Dag).…”
Section: Tell Aswad and Qdeir 1: Background And Previous Sourcing Stumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For Qdeir 1, 25 artefacts were characterized by NAA (Gratuze et al, 1993), of which five were allocated to the analysts' group 1b (Bingöl A/Nemrut Dag), 11 to Bingöl B and nine to Kayırlı (Göllü Dag).…”
Section: Tell Aswad and Qdeir 1: Background And Previous Sourcing Stumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This work inspired our sourcing project, which in turn forms part of a 'new wave' of Mediterranean, Anatolian and Near Eastern obsidian sourcing studies (cf. [30,35,56]). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Obsidian from geological sources in Turkey is wellknown at Mesolithic and Neolithic sites in southern Anatolia and the Levant [11,48,49,67,43,14,12,30], and has even been identified as far west as Sitagroi in northeastern Greece [3]; at the same time, obsidian from sources in eastern Turkey and Armenia was distributed to Mesopotamia and also the Levant [8,30]. While the central and eastern Anatolian sources were considered to be the most likely sources for the Camel Site samples, Aegean, Caucasian, and Red Sea sources were not excluded as possibilities (cf.…”
Section: Chemical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%