2021
DOI: 10.1017/etds.2021.4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-dense orbits on homogeneous spaces and applications to geometry and number theory

Abstract: Let G be a Lie group, let $\Gamma \subset G$ be a discrete subgroup, let $X=G/\Gamma $ and let f be an affine map from X to itself. We give conditions on a submanifold Z of X that guarantee that the set of points $x\in X$ with f-trajectories avoiding Z is hyperplane absolute winning (a property which implies full Hausdorff dimension and is stable under countable intersections). A similar result is proved for one-parameter actio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to prove the thickness result for the Euclidean norm, we use a result of the first-named author with An and Guan [2]. They give a very general condition on the critical locus L ν which guarantees that the set of A ∈ M m,n such that the trajectory {a s hx : s > 0} eventually stays away from L ν is winning in the sense of Schmidt.…”
Section: Thickness Results Via Transversalitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to prove the thickness result for the Euclidean norm, we use a result of the first-named author with An and Guan [2]. They give a very general condition on the critical locus L ν which guarantees that the set of A ∈ M m,n such that the trajectory {a s hx : s > 0} eventually stays away from L ν is winning in the sense of Schmidt.…”
Section: Thickness Results Via Transversalitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More precisely, the results in [AGK] deal with a modified version of Schmidt's winning property called hyperplane absolute winning (HAW). For the definition of the HAW property, see [BFKRW,§2] or [AGK,§2.1]. HAW implies winning in the sense of Schmidt [Sc1], and this in turn implies thickness.…”
Section: Thickness Results Via Transversalitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To reconcile our notation with that of [AGK,Theorem 2.8], we point out that for H and F as in (4.1), H is actually the maximally expanding horospherical subgroup of SL 3 (R) with respect to F + := {a s : s ≥ 0}, as defined in [AGK,§2.3]. Hence H coincides with the subgroup H max F + , and, consequently, condition (2.16) of [AGK,Theorem 2.8] is equivalent to the (F, H)-transversality. Also F is diagonalizable, therefore condition (2.17) is redundant.…”
Section: The Interaction Of the Critical Locus And The Flowmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also F is diagonalizable, therefore condition (2.17) is redundant. This is explained in [AGK,Remark 2.9(2)].…”
Section: The Interaction Of the Critical Locus And The Flowmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation