2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbagen.2004.04.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-covalent interaction between procyanidins and apple cell wall material

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

19
291
1
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 223 publications
(312 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
19
291
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This may indicate a comparatively low overall content of polymeric procyanidins in our material. In studies with apple pomace procyanidins were detected within the flesh, being a large part of the polymeric procyanidins tightly bounded to the cell wall polysaccharides [5,6]. After pressing, most of the released procyanidins remain in the pomace mainly composed of insoluble cell wall material, berry skins and kernels.…”
Section: Processing Effects On Polyphenolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This may indicate a comparatively low overall content of polymeric procyanidins in our material. In studies with apple pomace procyanidins were detected within the flesh, being a large part of the polymeric procyanidins tightly bounded to the cell wall polysaccharides [5,6]. After pressing, most of the released procyanidins remain in the pomace mainly composed of insoluble cell wall material, berry skins and kernels.…”
Section: Processing Effects On Polyphenolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cheynier et al (1997) reported that proanthocyanidins with 4-6 linkages bound more readily to proteins than those with predominantly 4-8 linkages. However, other structural features such as proportion of catechin versus epicatechin (Renard et al 2001), differences in substitution such as degree of galloylation (Le Bourvellec et al 2004), proportion of procyanidins relative to prodelphinidins Woodruffe 1984, Le Bourvellec et al 2004), polymer length (Haslam 1974, Porter and Woodruffe 1984, Sarni-Manchado et al 1997, Renard et al 2001), secondary structure such as branching, folding, crosslinking between tannin molecules (Asquith and Butler 1986) or the formation of helices (Fletcher et al 1977), and tertiary structures could also impact upon the binding kinetics of both protein and methylcellulose. Such differences in binding ability would result in different amounts of the total heterogeneous tannin pool being precipitated by each method.…”
Section: Seddon and Downey Comparison Of Tannin Analytical Methods 57mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1). The degree of polymerisation varies over a broad range from dimers up to about 200 monomeric flavonol units [11] B-type proanthocyanidins can be classified according to the hydroxylation pattern(s) of the chain-extender unit(s) as: procyanidins (3,5,7,39,49-pentahydroxylation), prodelphinidins (3,5,7,39,49,59-hexahydroxylation), propelargonidins (3,5,7,49-tetrahydroxylation), profisetinidins (3,7,39,49-tetrahydroxylation), prorobinetinidins (3,7,39,49,59-pentahydroxylation), proteracacinidins (3,7,8,49-tetrahydroxylation), promelacacinidins (3,7,8,39,49-pentahydroxylation), procassinidins (7,49-dihydroxylation) and probutinidins (7,39,49-trihydroxylation) (Fig. 2) [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%